Brain Correlates of Language Learning: The Neuronal Dissociation of Rule-Based versus Similarity-Based Learning

Language learning is one of the mysteries of human cognition. One of the crucial questions is the following: Does acquisition of grammatical knowledge depend primarily on abstract rules or on item-specific information? Although there is evidence that both mechanisms contribute to language acquisition, their relative importance during the process of language learning is unknown. Using an artificial grammar paradigm, we show by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging that the brain dissociates the two mechanisms: the left anterior hippocampus supports similarity-based learning, whereas the left ventral premotor cortex is selectively engaged by abstract rule processing. Moreover, data analysis over time on learning suggests that similarity-based learning plays a nonobligatory role during the initial phase, and that rule-based abstraction plays a crucial role during later learning.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[2]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[3]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989). , 1991 .

[4]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Salience of Item Knowledge in Learning Artificial Grammars , 1992 .

[5]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Implicit learning. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Remembrance of things past , 1995, Complex..

[7]  David R. Shanks,et al.  The Psychology of Associative Learning , 1995 .

[8]  L. Squire,et al.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[11]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  David Caplan,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[13]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[14]  N. Cohen,et al.  Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: Summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies , 1999, Hippocampus.

[15]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Remembrance of Things Past , 1999, Science.

[16]  R. Gómez,et al.  Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  A syntactic specialization for Broca's area. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Michael T. Ullman,et al.  The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model , 2001 .

[19]  G Lohmann,et al.  LIPSIA--a new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[20]  M. Gluck,et al.  Interactive memory systems in the human brain , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Anterior prefrontal cortex mediates rule learning in humans. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Syntactic Processing in Left Prefrontal Cortex Is Independent of Lexical Meaning , 2001, NeuroImage.

[23]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing a second language: Late learners''comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related b , 2001 .

[24]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Working Memory and the Establishment of Filler-Gap Dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[25]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Andrea Moro,et al.  Neural Correlates for the Acquisition of Natural Language Syntax , 2002, NeuroImage.

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[28]  L. Davachi,et al.  Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: insights from relational and item-based learning. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  S. Engel,et al.  Dynamics of the Hippocampus During Encoding and Retrieval of Face-Name Pairs , 2003, Science.

[30]  C. Büchel,et al.  Broca's area and the language instinct , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  T. Hendler,et al.  The Neural Reality of Syntactic Transformations , 2003, Psychological science.

[33]  Bertram Opitz,et al.  Interactions of the hippocampal system and the prefrontal cortex in learning language-like rules , 2003, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  What Is Learned From Artificial Grammars ? Transfer Tests of Simple Association , 2004 .