Communication and Coordination : The Case of Boundedly Rational Players

Using the level-k model of boundedly rational interaction, we fully characterize the e¤ects of pre-play communication in symmetric and generic 2 2 games. We …nd that oneway communication weakly increases coordination on Nash equilibrium outcomes in all such games. Although one-way communication entails Nash equilibrium when relatively sophisticated players meet, there are games in which average payo¤s fall when one-way communication is allowed. Two-way communication can yield higher average payo¤s than one-way communication in coordination games such as Stag Hunt, but in other games twoway communication reduces both average payo¤s and the degree of coordination below the no-communication level. Extending our analysis to larger and less symmetric games, we …nd that communication facilitates coordination in all two-player common interest games. However, we also identify games in which communication hampers coordination. Keywords: Pre-play communication, coordination games, Stag Hunt, level-k, bounded rationality. JEL codes: C72. This paper is an extensive revision of Ellingsen and Östling (2006). We have bene…ted greatly from the detailed comments from Vincent Crawford and three anonymous referees. We are also grateful for helpful discussions with Colin Camerer, Drew Fudenberg, Joseph Tao-yi Wang and seminar participants at the Arne Ryde Symposium 2007, California Institute of Technology, and Stockholm School of Economics. Financial support from the Torsten and Ragnar Söderberg Foundation and the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. yAddress: Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Box 6501, SE–113 83 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: tore.ellingsen@hhs.se. zAddress: Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Box 6501, SE–113 83 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: robert.ostling@hhs.se

[1]  Kenneth Clark,et al.  When are Nash equilibria self-enforcing? An experimental analysis , 2000, Int. J. Game Theory.

[2]  Tore Ellingsen,et al.  Is There a Hold – up Problem ? , 2000 .

[3]  V. Crawford,et al.  Fatal Attraction: Focality, Naivete, and Sophistication in Experimental "Hide-and-Seek" Games , 2007 .

[4]  Vincent P. Crawford,et al.  Let’s Talk It Over: Coordination Via Preplay Communication With Level-k Thinking , 2007 .

[5]  R. Aumann,et al.  Unraveling in Guessing Games : An Experimental Study , 2007 .

[6]  John Duffy,et al.  Do Actions Speak Louder than Words? An Experimental Comparison of Observation and Cheap Talk , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[7]  Martin Sefton,et al.  Communication and Efficiency in Coordination Game Experiments , 2005 .

[8]  L. Anderlini,et al.  Communication, Computability And Common Interest Games , 1999 .

[9]  J. Morgan,et al.  Cheap Talk , 2005 .

[10]  Karl Wärneryd,et al.  Evolutionary Stability in Unanimity Games with Cheap Talk , 1991 .

[11]  Miguel Costa-Gomes,et al.  A Suggested Interpretation of Some Experimental Results on Preplay Communication , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Abhijit Banerjee,et al.  Neutrally Stable Outcomes in Cheap-Talk Coordination Games , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[13]  D. Stahl,et al.  On Players' Models of Other Players: Theory and Experimental Evidence , 1995 .

[14]  Margaret Gilbert,et al.  Rationality, coordination, and convention , 1990, Synthese.

[15]  A. Rubinstein Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times , 2006 .

[16]  Setting the Anchor: Price Competition, Level-n Theory and Communication , 2007 .

[17]  Gary Charness,et al.  Self-Serving Cheap Talk: A Test Of Aumann's Conjecture , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  Matthew Rabin,et al.  A Model of Pre-game Communication , 1991 .

[19]  Martin Sefton,et al.  Risk, pre-play communication and equilibrium , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  Akihiko Matsui,et al.  Cheap-Talk and Cooperation in a Society , 1991 .

[21]  T. W. Ross,et al.  Communication in Coordination Games , 1992 .

[22]  Robert Forsythe,et al.  COMMUNICATION IN THE BATTLE OF THE SEXES GAME , 1989 .

[23]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  KS Language , meaning and games : a model of communication , coordination and evolution , 2007 .

[24]  Joseph Tao-Yi Wang,et al.  Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[25]  M. Rabin Communication between Rational Agents , 1990 .

[26]  Joseph Farrell Cheap Talk, Coordination, and Entry , 1987 .

[27]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 2003 .

[28]  V. Crawford Lying for Strategic Advantage: Rational and Boundedly Rational Misrepresentation of Intentions , 2003 .

[29]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games , 2004 .

[30]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study , 1998 .

[31]  Joseph Farrell Communication, coordination and Nash equilibrium , 1988 .

[32]  Robert Östling,et al.  Organizational Structure as the Channeling of Boundedly Rational Pre-play Communication , 2006 .

[33]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Credible negotiation statements and coherent plans , 1989 .

[34]  D. Stahl,et al.  Experimental evidence on players' models of other players , 1994 .

[35]  Andreas Blume,et al.  Communication, Risk and Efficiency in Games , 1998 .

[36]  T. Schelling Arms and In# uence , 2008 .

[37]  J. Sobel,et al.  AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO PRE-PLAY COMMUNICATION , 1995 .

[38]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Stated Beliefs and Play in Normal-Form Games , 2007 .

[39]  Meghana Bhatt,et al.  Self-Referential Thinking and Equilibrium as States of Mind in Games: Fmri Evidence , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..