On the relation between receptive field structure and stimulus selectivity in the tree shrew primary visual cortex.

There are notable differences in functional properties of primary visual cortex (V1) neurons among mammalian species, particularly those concerning the occurrence of simple and complex cells and the generation of orientation selectivity. Here, we present quantitative data on receptive field (RF) structure, response modulation, and orientation tuning for single neurons in V1 of the tree shrew, a close relative of primates. We find that spatial RF subfield segregation, a criterion for identifying simple cells, was exceedingly small in the tree shrew V1. In contrast, many neurons exhibited elevated F1/F0 modulation that is often used as a simple cell marker. This apparent discrepancy can be explained by the robust stimulus polarity preference in tree shrew V1, which inflates F1/F0 ratio values. RF structure mapped with sparse-noise-which is spatially restricted and emphasizes thalamo-cortical feed-forward inputs-appeared unrelated to orientation selectivity. However, RF structure mapped using the Hartley subspace stimulus-which covers a large area of the visual field and recruits considerable intracortical processing-did predict orientation preference. Our findings reveal a number of striking similarities in V1 functional organization between tree shrews and primates, emphasizing the important role of intracortical recurrent processing in shaping V1 response properties in these species.

[1]  Felix Bießmann,et al.  Functional and laminar dissociations between muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic neuromodulation in the tree shrew primary visual cortex , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons , 1997, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Shapley,et al.  Stimulus ensemble and cortical layer determine V1 spatial receptive fields , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. Vijay Anand,et al.  The linearity and selectivity of neuronal responses in awake visual cortex. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[5]  D. Fitzpatrick The functional organization of local circuits in visual cortex: insights from the study of tree shrew striate cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  R Kretz,et al.  Laminar organization of ON and OFF regions and ocular dominance in the striate cortex of the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  David Fitzpatrick,et al.  Emergent Properties of Layer 2/3 Neurons Reflect the Collinear Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  H. Sato,et al.  Orientation tuning of surround suppression in lateral geniculate nucleus and primary visual cortex of cat , 2007, Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Reid,et al.  Receptive field structure varies with layer in the primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Ringach,et al.  Retinal origin of orientation maps in visual cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Stryker,et al.  Relation of cortical cell orientation selectivity to alignment of receptive fields of the geniculocortical afferents that arborize within a single orientation column in ferret visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Judith A Hirsch,et al.  Laminar processing in the visual cortical column , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Spatial organization of receptive fields of V1 neurons of alert monkeys: comparison with responses to gratings. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Somjen,et al.  Receptive fields of neurons in areas 17 and 18 of tree shrews (Tupaia Glis) , 1979, Brain Research Bulletin.

[15]  D. Ferster,et al.  Orientation selectivity of thalamic input to simple cells of cat visual cortex , 1996, Nature.

[16]  R. Lund,et al.  Receptive field properties of single neurons in rat primary visual cortex. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Matthew A. Wilson,et al.  Micro-drive Array for Chronic in vivo Recording: Tetrode Assembly , 2009, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[18]  T. T. Norton,et al.  Laminar organization of receptive field properties in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the tree shrew (Tupaiaglis belangeri) , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  Moshe Gur,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi003 Orientation and Direction Selectivity of Neurons in V1 of Alert Monkeys: Functional Relationships and Laminar Distributions , 2022 .

[20]  David Fitzpatrick,et al.  A morphological basis for orientation tuning in primary visual cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. V. Multivariate statistical analyses and models. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  D. Pollen,et al.  Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurones in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Yves Frégnac,et al.  Adaptation of the simple or complex nature of V1 receptive fields to visual statistics , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Shapley,et al.  “Black” Responses Dominate Macaque Primary Visual Cortex V1 , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Alonso,et al.  Population receptive fields of ON and OFF thalamic inputs to an orientation column in visual cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Ferster,et al.  Prediction of Orientation Selectivity from Receptive Field Architecture in Simple Cells of Cat Visual Cortex , 2001, Neuron.

[27]  D. Ringach,et al.  Spatial overlap of ON and OFF subregions and its relation to response modulation ratio in macaque primary visual cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  R. Shapley,et al.  Generation of Black-Dominant Responses in V1 Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation , 1991, Vision Research.

[30]  J. G. Parnavelas,et al.  Response properties of neurons in the visual cortex of the rat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Robert Kretz,et al.  Neural response dynamics of spiking and local field potential activity depend on CRT monitor refresh rate in the tree shrew primary visual cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  B. Dreher,et al.  Phase sensitivity of complex cells in primary visual cortex , 2013, Neuroscience.

[34]  Henry J. Alitto,et al.  Influence of contrast on orientation and temporal frequency tuning in ferret primary visual cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  L. Peichl,et al.  Topography of cones and rods in the tree shrew retina , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  C. Gross,et al.  Visual topography of V2 in the macaque , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[38]  M. Ibbotson,et al.  On the division of cortical cells into simple and complex types: a comparative viewpoint. , 2005, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[39]  Robert Shapley,et al.  Receptive field structure of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex revealed by stimulation with natural image sequences. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[40]  M. Hawken,et al.  Laminar organization and contrast sensitivity of direction-selective cells in the striate cortex of the Old World monkey , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Ringach,et al.  On the classification of simple and complex cells , 2002, Vision Research.

[42]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  L. Martinez,et al.  Circuits that build visual cortical receptive fields , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  B. Dreher,et al.  Complex cells increase their phase sensitivity at low contrasts and following adaptation. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Circuitry and the classification of simple and complex cells in V1. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The contribution of spike threshold to the dichotomy of cortical simple and complex cells , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Link between orientation and retinotopic maps in primary visual cortex , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Heather J. Chisum,et al.  The contribution of vertical and horizontal connections to the receptive field center and surround in V1 , 2004, Neural Networks.

[49]  W. M. Keck,et al.  Highly Selective Receptive Fields in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.