Collaboration in Human-Robot Teams

Many new applications for robots require them to work alongside people as capable members of human-robot teams. These include—in the long term—robots for homes, hospitals, and offices, but already exist in more advanced settings, such as space exploration. The work reported in this paper is part of an ongoing collaboration with NASA JSC to develop Robonaut, a humanoid robot envisioned to work with human astronauts on maintenance operations for space missions. To date, work with Robonaut has mainly investigated performing a joint task with a human in which the robot is being teleoperated. However, perceptive disorientation, sensory noise, and control delays make teleoperation cognitively exhausting even for a highly skilled operator. Control delays in long range teleoperation also make shoulder-to-shoulder teamwork difficult. These issues motivate our work to make robots collaborating with people more autonomous. Our work focuses on a scenario of a human and an autonomous humanoid robot working together shoulder-to-shoulder, sharing the workspace and the objects required to complete a task. A robotic member of such a team must be able to work towards a shared goal, and be in agreement with the human as to the sequence of actions that will be required to reach that goal, as well as dynamically adjust its plan according to the human’s actions. Human-robot collaboration of this nature is an important yet relatively unexplored kind of human-robot interaction. This paper describes our work towards building a dynamic collaborative framework enabling such an interaction. We discuss our architecture and its implementation for controlling a humanoid robot, working on a task with a human partner. Our approach stems from Joint Intention Theory, which shows that for joint action to emerge, teammates must communicate to maintain a set of shared beliefs and to coordinate their actions towards the shared plan. In addition, they must demonstrate commitment to doing their own part, to the others doing theirs, to providing mutual support, and finally—to a mutual belief as to the state of the task. We argue that to this end, the concept of task and action goals is central. We therefore present a goal-driven hierarchical task representation, and a resulting collaborative turn-taking system, implementing many of the above-mentioned requirements of a robotic teammate. Additionally, we show the implementation of relevant social skills supporting our collaborative framework. Finally, we present a demonstration of our system for collaborative execution of a hierarchical object manipulation task by a robot-human team. Our humanoid robot is able to divide the task between the participants while taking into consideration the collaborator’s actions when deciding what to do next. It is capable of asking for mutual support in the cases where it is unable to perform a certain action. To facilitate this interaction, the robot actively maintains a clear and intuitive channel of communication to synchronize goals, task states, and actions, resulting in a fluid, efficient collaboration.

[1]  W. Johnson,et al.  Task-oriented collaboration with embodied agents in virtual worlds , 2001 .

[2]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Tutelage and Collaboration for Humanoid Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[3]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Integrating cognition, perception and action through mental simulation in robots , 2004, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Stephen M. Rock,et al.  Dialogue-based human-robot interaction for space construction teams , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[5]  David R. Traum,et al.  Negotiation over tasks in hybrid human-agent teams for simulation-based training , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[6]  Fredrik Rehnmark,et al.  Robonaut: A Robot Designed to Work with Humans in Space , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[7]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Children's coding of human action: cognitive factors influencing imitation in 3-year-olds. , 2000, Developmental science.

[8]  Donald D. Dudenhoeffer,et al.  Dynamic-Autonomy for Urban Search and Rescue , 2002, AAAI Mobile Robot Competition.

[9]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Collaboration, Dialogue, Human-Robot Interaction , 2001, ISRR.

[10]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  COLLAGEN: Applying Collaborative Discourse Theory to Human-Computer Interaction , 2001, AI Mag..

[11]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Discerning intentions in dynamic human action , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  How to trust robots further than we can throw them , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[13]  Kristinn R. Thórisson Gandalf: an embodied humanoid capable of real-time multimodal dialogue with people , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[14]  J. J. Guajardo,et al.  How infants make sense of intentional action , 2001 .

[15]  Yukiko I. Nakano,et al.  Towards a Model of Face-to-Face Grounding , 2003, ACL.

[16]  H. Woern,et al.  COOPERATION BETWEEN HUMAN BEINGS AND ROBOT SYSTEMS IN AN INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT , 2001 .

[17]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Dual ecologies of robot as communication media: thoughts on coordinating orientations and projectability , 2004, CHI.

[18]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Collaboration, Dialogue, and Human-Robot Interaction , 2001 .

[19]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Tutelage and socially guided robot learning , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[20]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Shared Cooperative Activity , 1991 .

[21]  Jesse V. Gray Goal and action inference for helpful robots using self as simulator , 2004 .

[22]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Collaborative Systems (AAAI-94 Presidential Address) , 1996 .

[23]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Task-model based human robot cooperation using vision , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[24]  Magdalena D. Bugajska,et al.  Building a Multimodal Human-Robot Interface , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[25]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  On Acting Together , 1990, AAAI.

[26]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Fan-out: measuring human control of multiple robots , 2004, CHI.

[27]  J. Searle Consciousness and Language: Collective Intentions and Actions , 2002 .