Robotics and STEM learning: students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy—practice, problem solving, and projects

This study presents the case of development and evaluation of a STEM-oriented 30-h robotics course for junior high school students (n = 32). Class activities were designed according to the P3 Task Taxonomy, which included: (1) practice—basic closed-ended tasks and exercises; (2) problem solving—small-scale open-ended assignments in which the learner can choose the solution method or arrive at different answers; and (3) project-based learning—open-ended challenging tasks. The research aimed at exploring students’ working patterns, achievements in learning the course, and the impact of this experience on students’ motivation to learn STEM subjects. Evaluation tools included a final exam on factual, procedural and conceptual knowledge in the STEM subject learned in the course, class observations, interviews with the students, and administrating an attitude questionnaire before and after the course. Since the experimental class was quite heterogenic in regard to students’ prior learning achievements and motivation to learn, some of the students completed just the basic exercises, others coped well with the problem-solving tasks, and only a few took it upon themselves to carry out a complex project. However, all students showed high motivation to learn robotics and STEM subjects. In summary, robotics provides a very rich and attractive learning environment for STEM education. Yet, the realization of this potential depends largely on careful design of the course methodology and especially the students’ assignments in the class. One should recognize that often only some students are capable of learning a new subject on their own through project work, and these students also need to gain additional knowledge and skills before dealing with complex projects.

[1]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  Moshe Barak,et al.  From ‘doing’ to ‘doing with learning’: reflection on an effort to promote self-regulated learning in technological projects in high school , 2012 .

[3]  Yuxin Ma,et al.  Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp , 2007 .

[4]  Prashant Doshi,et al.  Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[5]  J. H. Frey,et al.  The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement. , 2005 .

[6]  Margus Pedaste,et al.  LEARNING APPROACHES TO APPLYING ROBOTICS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION , 2013, Journal of Baltic Science Education.

[7]  C. Hmelo‐Silver Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[8]  A. Collins,et al.  Cognition and learning. , 1996 .

[9]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[10]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Sound, Waves and Communication: Students’ Achievements and Motivation in Learning a STEM-Oriented Program , 2014 .

[11]  David Crismond,et al.  Scaffolding Strategies For Integrating Engineering Design and Scientific Inquiry in Project-Based Learning Environments , 2011 .

[12]  Michael J. Booker,et al.  A Roof without Walls: Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy and the Misdirection of American Education , 2007 .

[13]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  REFLECTIONS ON PROJECT WORK AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING , 1996 .

[14]  J. Hiebert,et al.  Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  K. Cagiltay,et al.  Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps , 2014 .

[16]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .

[17]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Project InterActions: A Multigenerational Robotic Learning Environment , 2007 .

[18]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade , 2015, International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

[19]  Chronoula Voutsina,et al.  Procedural and conceptual changes in young children’s problem solving , 2012 .

[20]  Sharon Lang,et al.  The Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel, 1948 to 2000: A Political Study , 2003 .

[21]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[22]  Kate Highfield,et al.  Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving , 2010 .

[23]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  The Role of Theory in the Study of Peer Collaboration , 2000 .

[24]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  The Role of New Technologies to Foster Positive Youth Development , 2006 .

[25]  Johanna Leppävirta,et al.  Complex Problem Exercises in Developing Engineering Students' Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Electromagnetics , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[26]  Marina Milner-Bolotin,et al.  Examination of factors predicting secondary students’ interest in tertiary STEM education , 2016 .

[27]  C. V. D. van der Vleuten,et al.  Problem‐based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research , 2005, Medical education.

[28]  Majid Al Haj Immigration and ethnic formation in a deeply divided society : the case of the 1990s immigrants from the Former Soviet Union in Israel , 2004 .

[29]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Projects in Technology Education and Fostering Learning: The Potential and Its Realization , 2008 .

[30]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[31]  F. Azaiza,et al.  Processes of conservation and change in Arab society in Israel: Implications for the health and welfare of the Arab population , 2013 .

[32]  Chan-Jin Chung,et al.  Assessing the Impact of an Autonomous Robotics Competition for STEM Education , 2014 .

[33]  J. Piaget The Moral Judgment of the Child , 1932 .

[34]  Amy Eguchi,et al.  RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[35]  John R. Savery,et al.  Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. , 2006 .

[36]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[37]  湯淺 太一,et al.  20世紀の名著名論:Seymour Papert: Mindstorms:Children Computers and Powerful Ideas Basic Books New York 1980 , 2005 .

[38]  Ivan Kastelan,et al.  E2LP: A Unified Embedded Engineering Learning Platform , 2013, 2013 Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design.

[39]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Teaching image-processing concepts in junior high school: boys’ and girls’ achievements and attitudes towards technology , 2012 .

[40]  Robert McCormick,et al.  Issues of Learning and Knowledge in Technology Education , 2004 .

[41]  Majid Al-Haj,et al.  Immigration and Ethnic Formation in a Deeply Divided Society: The Case of the 1990s Immigrants from the Former Soviet Union in Israel , 2004 .

[42]  Robert McCormick,et al.  Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge , 1997 .

[43]  Scott C. Marley,et al.  Guided Instruction Improves Elementary Student Learning and Self-Efficacy in Science , 2015 .

[44]  P. Mayring Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution , 2014 .

[45]  Majid Al-Haj,et al.  The Changing Arab Kinship Structure: The Effect of Modernization in an Urban Community , 1988, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[46]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technology Interventions on Youth STEM Learning and Attitudes , 2010 .

[47]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[48]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[49]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[50]  Alis Oancea,et al.  Introduction to Research Methods in Education , 2009 .

[51]  Randall E. Groth,et al.  Preservice Elementary Teachers' Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Mean, Median, and Mode , 2006 .

[52]  John W. Thomas,et al.  A REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON PROJECT-BASED LEARNING , 2000 .

[53]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[54]  S. Joseph,et al.  Patriarchy and development in the Arab world. , 1996, Gender and development.