Visual Object Processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Young,et al. Human Cognitive Neuropsychology , 2013 .
[2] G. Orban. The extraction of 3D shape in the visual system of human and nonhuman primates. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.
[3] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Uncovering the visual “alphabet”: Advances in our understanding of object perception , 2011, Vision Research.
[4] G. Rhodes,et al. Sex-specific norms code face identity. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[5] Linda Jeffery,et al. Race-specific norms for coding face identity and a functional role for norms. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[6] Elan Barenholtz. Convexities move because they contain matter. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[7] Tandra Ghose,et al. Extremal edges versus other principles of figure-ground organization. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[8] G. Rhodes,et al. Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces , 2010, Vision Research.
[9] Alexandra J. Golby,et al. Robust Selectivity to Two-Object Images in Human Visual Cortex , 2010, Current Biology.
[10] C. Baker,et al. The neural basis of visual object learning , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[11] R. Farivar. Dorsal–ventral integration in object recognition , 2009, Brain Research Reviews.
[12] Soojin Park,et al. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception , 2009, NeuroImage.
[13] Dirk B. Walther,et al. Natural Scene Categories Revealed in Distributed Patterns of Activity in the Human Brain , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[14] Doris Y. Tsao,et al. A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.
[15] G. Rhodes,et al. The fusiform face area and occipital face area show sensitivity to spatial relations in faces , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.
[16] C. Gross,et al. Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative FMRI study. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.
[17] M. Tarr,et al. Figure-ground assignment to a translating contour: a preference for advancing vs. receding motion. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[18] P.-J. Hsieh,et al. Feature mixing rather than feature replacement during perceptual filling-in , 2009, Vision Research.
[19] R. Tootell,et al. An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[20] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.
[21] H. Barlow,et al. Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology? , 1972, Perception.
[22] B. Jagadeesh. Recognizing Grandmother , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.
[23] Doris Y. Tsao,et al. Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[24] S. Palmer,et al. Edge-region grouping in figure-ground organization and depth perception. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[25] Eric T. Carlson,et al. A neural code for three-dimensional object shape in macaque inferotemporal cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.
[26] Doris Y. Tsao,et al. Mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.
[27] Russell A. Epstein,et al. Two kinds of FMRI repetition suppression? Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.
[28] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Perception of emotional expressions is independent of face selectivity in monkey inferior temporal cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] C. Koch,et al. Sparse but not ‘Grandmother-cell’ coding in the medial temporal lobe , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] S. Palmer,et al. Extremal Edges A Powerful Cue to Depth Perception and Figure-Ground Organization , 2007 .
[31] E. Rolls. The representation of information about faces in the temporal and frontal lobes , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[32] R. Goebel,et al. Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[33] Nikos K. Logothetis,et al. Facial-Expression and Gaze-Selective Responses in the Monkey Amygdala , 2007, Current Biology.
[34] Jacob Feldman,et al. Determination of visual figure and ground in dynamically deforming shapes , 2006, Cognition.
[35] R. Kiani,et al. Microstimulation of inferotemporal cortex influences face categorization , 2006, Nature.
[36] M. Giese,et al. Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2006, Nature.
[37] Doris Y. Tsao,et al. A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.
[38] Glyn W Humphreys,et al. Features, objects, action: The cognitive neuropsychology of visual object processing, 1984–2004 , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[39] Stephen L Macknik,et al. Visibility, visual awareness, and visual masking of simple unattended targets are confined to areas in the occipital cortex beyond human V1/V2. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[40] H. Wilson,et al. fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[41] Charles E. Connor. Neuroscience: Friends and grandmothers , 2005, Nature.
[42] C. Koch,et al. Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.
[43] C. Gross,et al. Representations of faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex: a functional MRI study. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[44] B. Duchaine,et al. Visual Agnosia, 2nd Ed. , 2005 .
[45] Deborah E. Hannula,et al. Imaging implicit perception: promise and pitfalls , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[46] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. A new cue to figure–ground coding: top–bottom polarity , 2004, Vision Research.
[47] M. Corbetta,et al. Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[48] Anastasia V. Flevaris,et al. Exogenous Spatial Attention Influences Figure-Ground Assignment , 2004 .
[49] J. Koenderink,et al. The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.
[50] S. Yamane,et al. What facial features activate face neurons in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[51] D. V. van Essen,et al. Surface-based approaches to spatial localization and registration in primate cerebral cortex. , 2004, NeuroImage.
[52] Hisao Nishijo,et al. Neuronal correlates of face identification in the monkey anterior temporal cortical areas. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.
[53] D. Perrett,et al. Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.
[54] M. Seghier,et al. A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[55] Rolf Nelson,et al. When does grouping happen? , 2003, Acta psychologica.
[56] Doris Y. Tsao,et al. Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[57] C. Gross. Genealogy of the “Grandmother Cell” , 2002, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.
[58] G. Woodman,et al. Lower region: a new cue for figure-ground assignment. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[59] Christof Koch,et al. Single-neuron correlates of subjective vision in the human medial temporal lobe , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[60] T. Poggio,et al. Neural mechanisms of object recognition , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[61] J. Norman. Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[62] P. Tse. A contour propagation approach to surface filling-in and volume formation. , 2001, Psychological review.
[63] P. Bennett,et al. Generalized Common Fate: Grouping by Common Luminance Changes , 2001, Psychological science.
[64] N. Kanwisher,et al. The Human Body , 2001 .
[65] Russell A. Epstein,et al. Neuropsychological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[66] Edward H. Adelson,et al. Synchrony does not promote grouping in temporally structured displays , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.
[67] Michael J Tarr,et al. What defines a view? , 2001, Vision Research.
[68] N. Kanwisher,et al. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.
[69] S. Schultz. Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. , 2001 .
[70] T. Hendler,et al. A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.
[71] Refractor. Vision , 2000, The Lancet.
[72] A. O'Toole,et al. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.
[73] Tomaso Poggio,et al. Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[74] S. Palmer,et al. Late influences on perceptual grouping: Illusory figures , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[75] Charles G. Gross,et al. Coding for visual categories in the human brain , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[76] C. Koch,et al. Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[77] Martha J. Farah,et al. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision , 2000 .
[78] H. Barlow. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology by Stephen E. Palmer , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[79] T. Poggio,et al. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[80] S. Edelman,et al. Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.
[81] Kenji Kawano,et al. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex , 1999, Nature.
[82] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[83] R Blake,et al. Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.
[84] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.
[85] R. Blake,et al. Visual features that vary together over time group together over space , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[86] Nancy Kanwisher,et al. A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.
[87] D. V. van Essen,et al. Functional and structural mapping of human cerebral cortex: solutions are in the surfaces. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[88] S. Edelman,et al. Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .
[89] H R Wilson,et al. Evolving Concepts of Spatial Channels in Vision: From Independence to Nonlinear Interactions , 1997, Perception.
[90] N. Kanwisher,et al. The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[91] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Salience of visual parts , 1997, Cognition.
[92] Jon Driver,et al. Edge-Assignment and Figure–Ground Segmentation in Short-Term Visual Matching , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.
[93] T. Allison,et al. Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[94] S. Ullman. High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition , 1996 .
[95] Stephen E. Palmer,et al. Late influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[96] M. Paradiso,et al. Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain , 1996 .
[97] J. Hummel,et al. Categorical relations in shape perception. , 1996, Spatial vision.
[98] David L. Sheinberg,et al. Visual object recognition. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.
[99] I. Biederman,et al. Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .
[100] M J Tarr,et al. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[101] T. Allison,et al. Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.
[102] M. Kubovy,et al. Grouping by Proximity and Multistability in Dot Lattices: A Quantitative Gestalt Theory , 1995 .
[103] N. Logothetis,et al. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.
[104] L. Cosmides. From : The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1995 .
[105] W Singer,et al. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.
[106] I Rock,et al. On the nature and order of organizational processing: A reply to Peterson , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[107] N. Logothetis,et al. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys , 1994, Current Biology.
[108] S. Palmer,et al. Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[109] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.
[110] I. Biederman,et al. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[111] S. Palmer,et al. Grouping Based on Phenomenal Similarity of Achromatic Color , 1992, Perception.
[112] S. Edelman,et al. Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.
[113] M. Farah. Is an Object an Object an Object? Cognitive and Neuropsychological Investigations of Domain Specificity in Visual Object Recognition , 1992 .
[114] I. Biederman,et al. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.
[115] J. Sergent,et al. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[116] I. Biederman,et al. Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .
[117] M. Goodale,et al. Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.
[118] H H Bülthoff,et al. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[119] Ronen Basri,et al. Recognition by Linear Combinations of Models , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[120] I. Biederman,et al. Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[121] J. Tanaka,et al. Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[122] J. Horton,et al. The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.
[123] Mary A. Peterson,et al. The initial identification of figure-ground relationships: Contributions from shape recognition processes , 1991 .
[124] P. Goldman-Rakic,et al. Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age , 1991 .
[125] D. J. Felleman,et al. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.
[126] G. Ettlinger. “Object Vision” and “Spatial Vision”: The Neuropsychological Evidence for the Distinction , 1990, Cortex.
[127] T. Poggio,et al. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.
[128] E. Reed. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .
[129] S. Ullman. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.
[130] M. Hasselmo,et al. The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.
[131] M. Tarr,et al. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.
[132] W. Singer,et al. Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[133] T Landis,et al. Prosopagnosia and agnosia for noncanonical views. An autopsied case. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[134] H. Lissauer,et al. A case of visual agnosia with a contribution to theory , 1988 .
[135] O. G. Selfridge,et al. Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning , 1988 .
[136] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[137] J. Moreno. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales , 1986 .
[138] P. Jolicoeur. The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.
[139] A. J. Mistlin,et al. Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[140] D. Lowe. Perceptual organization and visual recognition , 2012 .
[141] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.
[142] T. Shallice,et al. Category specific semantic impairments , 1984 .
[143] R. Desimone,et al. Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[144] Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al. Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.
[145] Rolls Et. Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. , 1984 .
[146] E. Rolls. Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. , 1984, Human neurobiology.
[147] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.
[148] G. V. Van Hoesen,et al. Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.
[149] R. Desimone,et al. Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.
[150] E. Warrington,et al. Two Categorical Stages of Object Recognition , 1978, Perception.
[151] D. Marr,et al. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[152] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Inferotemporal versus combined pulvinar-prestriate lesions in the rhesus monkey: Effects on color, object and pattern discrimination , 1977, Neuropsychologia.
[153] Wayne D. Gray,et al. Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.
[154] Walter Gerbino,et al. Convexity and Symmetry in Figure-Ground Organization , 1976 .
[155] E. Rosch. The nature of mental codes for color categories. , 1975 .
[156] E. Rosch. Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .
[157] tephen E. Palmer. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.
[158] P. Milner. A model for visual shape recognition. , 1974, Psychological review.
[159] Dave Bartram,et al. The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming , 1974 .
[160] A. Taylor,et al. The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.
[161] I. Biederman,et al. Searching for objects in real-world scences. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.
[162] I. Biederman. Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.
[163] H B Barlow,et al. Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? , 1972, Perception.
[164] D. B. Bender,et al. Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.
[165] Jaakko Hintikka,et al. On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .
[166] D. Hubel,et al. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.
[167] U. Neisser. Cognitive Psychology: Classic Edition , 1967 .
[168] I. Rock,et al. GROUPING BASED ON PHENOMENAL PROXIMITY. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.
[169] D. Hubel,et al. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.
[170] D. Hubel,et al. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.
[171] J. Hochberg,et al. A quantitative index of stimulus-similarity proximity vs. differences in brightness. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.
[172] Figural after-effect, after-image, and physiological nystagmus. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.
[173] M. Wertheimer. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .
[174] Max Wertheimer,et al. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt , 2017 .
[175] J. Changeux,et al. SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY AS BASIS OF BRAIN ORGANIZATION , 2022 .