Synaptic Plasticity and Connectivity Requirements to Produce Stimulus-Pair Specific Responses in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons

Animals must respond selectively to specific combinations of salient environmental stimuli in order to survive in complex environments. A task with these features, biconditional discrimination, requires responses to select pairs of stimuli that are opposite to responses to those stimuli in another combination. We investigate the characteristics of synaptic plasticity and network connectivity needed to produce stimulus-pair neural responses within randomly connected model networks of spiking neurons trained in biconditional discrimination. Using reward-based plasticity for synapses from the random associative network onto a winner-takes-all decision-making network representing perceptual decision-making, we find that reliably correct decision making requires upstream neurons with strong stimulus-pair selectivity. By chance, selective neurons were present in initial networks; appropriate plasticity mechanisms improved task performance by enhancing the initial diversity of responses. We find long-term potentiation of inhibition to be the most beneficial plasticity rule by suppressing weak responses to produce reliably correct decisions across an extensive range of networks.

[1]  Britt Anderson,et al.  XOR style tasks for testing visual object processing in monkeys , 2006, Vision Research.

[2]  P. Cisek,et al.  Decisions in Changing Conditions: The Urgency-Gating Model , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  From biophysics to cognition: reward-dependent adaptive choice behavior , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Niraj S. Desai,et al.  Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons , 1998, Nature.

[6]  John P Aggleton,et al.  The importance of the rat hippocampus for learning the structure of visual arrays , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  D. Amit,et al.  Retrospective and prospective persistent activity induced by Hebbian learning in a recurrent cortical network , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  S. Nelson,et al.  Potentiation of cortical inhibition by visual deprivation , 2006, Nature.

[9]  Harald Lachnit,et al.  Configural learning in human Pavlovian conditioning: acquisition of a biconditional discrimination , 2002, Biological Psychology.

[10]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Internal Representation of Task Rules by Recurrent Dynamics: The Importance of the Diversity of Neural Responses , 2010, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[11]  John N. J. Reynolds,et al.  Dopamine-dependent plasticity of corticostriatal synapses , 2002, Neural Networks.

[12]  F. Reinoso-suárez,et al.  Cortical connections of the insular and adjacent parieto-temporal fields in the cat. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  L. Abbott,et al.  Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Thomas K. Berger,et al.  Heterogeneity in the pyramidal network of the medial prefrontal cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Sen Song,et al.  Highly Nonrandom Features of Synaptic Connectivity in Local Cortical Circuits , 2005, PLoS biology.

[16]  Wendy A Suzuki,et al.  Integrating associative learning signals across the brain , 2007, Hippocampus.

[17]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  B. McGonigle,et al.  A model of Transitive Choice , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[19]  Yasushi Miyashita,et al.  Active Maintenance of Associative Mnemonic Signal in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[20]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[21]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Elemental Representations of Stimuli in Associative Learning , 2022 .

[22]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Rate, Timing, and Cooperativity Jointly Determine Cortical Synaptic Plasticity , 2001, Neuron.

[23]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans , 1996, Nature.

[25]  S. Nelson,et al.  Strength through Diversity , 2008, Neuron.

[26]  David W. Nauen,et al.  Coactivation and timing-dependent integration of synaptic potentiation and depression , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Emergence of network structure due to spike-timing-dependent plasticity in recurrent neuronal networks. II. Input selectivity—symmetry breaking , 2009, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Hebbian Learning of Context in Recurrent Neural Networks , 1996, Neural Computation.

[29]  J. Bloedel Functional heterogeneity with structural homogeneity: How does the cerebellum operate? , 1992 .

[30]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[31]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Triplets of Spikes in a Model of Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Arianna Maffei,et al.  Critical Period for Inhibitory Plasticity in RodentBinocular V1 , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  Introduction to theoretical neurobiology , 1988 .

[34]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.

[35]  H Eichenbaum,et al.  Critical role of the parahippocampal region for paired-associate learning in rats. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[36]  Klaus G. Melchers,et al.  Stimulus coding in human associative learning: Flexible representations of parts and wholes , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[37]  N. Brunel Persistent activity and the single-cell frequency–current curve in a cortical network model , 2000, Network.

[38]  Xiao-Jing Wang Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  W. Newsome,et al.  The Variable Discharge of Cortical Neurons: Implications for Connectivity, Computation, and Information Coding , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Yasushi Miyashita,et al.  Generation of fractal patterns for probing the visual memory , 1991, Neuroscience Research.

[41]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains , 2002, Nature.

[42]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[44]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Rate and timing in cortical synaptic plasticity. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  G. Lynch,et al.  Long‐term potentiation and depression of synaptic responses in the rat hippocampus: localization and frequency dependency. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  L. Abbott,et al.  Cortical Development and Remapping through Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2001, Neuron.

[47]  Stefano Fusi,et al.  Attractor concretion as a mechanism for the formation of context representations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[48]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[50]  C. Stevens,et al.  Heterogeneity of Release Probability, Facilitation, and Depletion at Central Synapses , 1997, Neuron.

[51]  Eve Marder,et al.  Animal-to-Animal Variability in Motor Pattern Production in Adults and during Growth , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.