Does laminar position determine the receptive field properties of cortical neurons? A study of corticotectal cells in area 17 of the normal mouse and the reeler mutant

The neocortex of the reeler (rl) mutant mouse develops abnormally; as a result, the orderly arrangement of cells in laminae containing neurons of similar size and configuration is severely disrupted. The reeler mutant thus offers an opportunity to study the role played by laminar position in establishing the interneuronal connections of the cortex. Since the receptive field properties of neurons in the primary visual cortex (area 17) are determined by these complex interconnections, a study of receptive field properties provides a useful way to test whether functionally important connections are altered by abnormal cell position. We chose the corticotectal (CT) cells of area 17 for this analysis because they have distinctive receptive field properties and can be identified positively by antidromic stimulation with electrodes in the superior colliculus. In addition, CT cells are located in a single lamina (layer V) in the visual cortex of normal mice, but are distributed from surface to white matter in the reeler visual cortex. We characterized the receptive fields of identified CT cells in area 17 of normal mice and reeler mutants and studied several properties of these cells quantitatively. Corticotectal cells in the visual cortex of the normal mouse have high rates of spontaneous activity and large receptive fields that are neither oriented nor directional; they respond to moving stimuli over a wide range of stimulus velocities, have high peak velocity sensitivities, and show very little spatial summation. Corticotectal cells in the visual cortex of the reeler mutant do not differ significantly in these characteristics, although CT cells with extremely large receptive fields are encountered somewhat more frequently in reeler cortex. These findings indicate that the detailed connections which determine the receptive field properties of CT cells are properly established in the reeler mutant mouse despite the markedly abnormal positions of CT cells in reeler visual cortex.

[1]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Laminar patterns of geniculocortical projection in the cat , 1976, Brain Research.

[2]  R. Sidman,et al.  Time of origin of corresponding cell classes in the cerebral cortex of normal and reeler mutant mice: An autoradiographic analysis , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Morphology and intracortical projections of functionally characterised neurones in the cat visual cortex , 1979, Nature.

[4]  N. Mangini,et al.  Retinotopic organization of striate and extrastriate visual cortex in the mouse , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  B L Finlay,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. IV. Corticotectal cells. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Peters,et al.  The projection of the lateral geniculate nucleus to area 17 of the rat cerebral cortex. V. Degenerating axon terminals synapsing with Golgi impregnated neurons , 1979, Journal of neurocytology.

[7]  G. Henry,et al.  Anatomical organization of the primary visual cortex (area 17) of the cat. A comparison with area 17 of the macaque monkey , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  U. Dräger,et al.  Reeler Mutant Mice: Physiology in Primary Visual Cortex , 1976 .

[9]  J. Changeux,et al.  Anatomical, physiological and biochemical studies of the cerebellum from Reeler mutant mouse. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  W. Cowan,et al.  The morphology of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus in normal and reeler mice , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  P. Rakić.  Neurons in Rhesus Monkey Visual Cortex: Systematic Relation between Time of Origin and Eventual Disposition , 1974, Science.

[12]  V S Caviness,et al.  Patterns of cell and fiber distribution in the neocortex of the reeler mutant mouse , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  W. Cowan,et al.  The organization of certain afferents to the hippocampus and dentate gyrus in normal and reeler mice , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  V. Caviness,et al.  Interhemispheric neocortical connections of the corpus callosum in the reeler mutant mouse: A study based on anterograde and retrograde methods , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  J. Tigges,et al.  Complementary laminar terminations of afferents to area 17 originating in area 18 and in the lateral geniculate nucleus in squirrel monkey , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  L. Maffei,et al.  Spatial frequency rows in the striate visual cortex , 1977, Vision Research.

[17]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Cell structure and function in the visual cortex of the cat , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  V. Caviness,et al.  Determinants of cell shape and orientation: A comparative Golgi analysis of cell‐axon interrelationships in the developing neocortex of normal and reeler mice , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  D. Hubel,et al.  Laminar and columnar distribution of geniculo‐cortical fibers in the macaque monkey , 1972, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  D. Ferster,et al.  The axonal arborizations of lateral geniculate neurons in the striate cortex of the cat , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Gilbert.  Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The projections of cells in different layers of the cat's visual cortex , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  W. Cowan,et al.  The development of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus in normal and reeler mice , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[26]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Layer I of striate cortex of Tupaia glis and Galago senegalensis: Projections from thalamus and claustrum revealed by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  R. Sidman,et al.  Autoradiographic Study of Cell Migration during Histogenesis of Cerebral Cortex in the Mouse , 1961, Nature.

[28]  L. Palmer,et al.  Visual receptive fields of single striate corical units projecting to the superior colliculus in the cat. , 1974, Brain research.

[29]  D. Hubel,et al.  Responses to visual stimulation and relationship between visual, auditory, and somatosensory inputs in mouse superior colliculus. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  T. Bliss,et al.  An electrophysiological study of the hippocampus of the ‘reeler’ mutant mouse , 1974, Nature.

[32]  P. Rakic.  Synaptic specificity in the cerebellar cortex: study of anomalous circuits induced by single gene mutations in mice. , 1976, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[33]  U. Dräger,et al.  Receptive fields of single cells and topography in mouse visual cortex , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  J. Movshon.  The velocity tuning of single units in cat striate cortex. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  W. Singer,et al.  Excitatory synaptic ensemble properties in the visual cortex of the macaque monkey: A current source density analysis of electrically evoked potentials , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Receptive-field properties of neurons in different laminae of visual cortex of the cat. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.