An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computers games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom

This study employed a case study design (Yin, Case study research, design and methods, 2009) to investigate the processes used by 5th graders to design and develop computer games within the context of their environmental science unit, using the theoretical framework of constructionism. Ten fifth graders designed computer games using Scratch software. The results showed students were able to design functional games, following a learning-by-design process of planning, designing, testing, and sharing. Observations revealed that game design led to opportunities for informal knowledge building and sharing among students. This, in turn, encouraged students to test and improve their designs. The findings support the conclusion that elementary students can develop programming concepts and create computer games when using graphical programming software developed for their level of experience. Insights into the iterative process of learning-by-game design are presented.

[1]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Programming by choice: urban youth learning programming with scratch , 2008, SIGCSE '08.

[2]  Sharon M. Carver.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Assessing for Deep Understanding , 2005 .

[3]  Kung Ming Tiong,et al.  Learning through Computer Game Design: Possible Success (or Failure) Factors , 2008 .

[4]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[5]  Yasmin Kafai.  Video game designs by girls and boys: variability and consistency of gender differences , 1998 .

[6]  Richard N. Van Eck.  Using Games to Promote Girls' Positive Attitudes Toward Technology , 2006 .

[7]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Project KID DESIGNER: Constructivism at Work through Play , 1998 .

[8]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .

[9]  K. Peppler,et al.  From SuperGoo to Scratch: exploring creative digital media production in informal learning , 2007 .

[10]  K. Squire.  Changing the Game: What Happens When Video Games Enter the Classroom? , 2005 .

[11]  David W. Shaffer,et al.  Epistemic frames for epistemic games , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[13]  Judy Robertson,et al.  Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Randy Pausch,et al.  Alice: a 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts , 2000 .

[15]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integration , 2000 .

[16]  Julian Sefton-Green,et al.  Informal Learning: Substance or style? , 2003 .

[17]  Y. Kafai.  Playing and Making Games for Learning , 2006, Games Cult..

[18]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[19]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds , 2007 .

[20]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Affordances of Collaborative Software Design Planning for Elementary Students' Science Talk , 2001 .

[21]  湯淺 太一,et al.  20世紀の名著名論:Seymour Papert: Mindstorms:Children Computers and Powerful Ideas Basic Books New York 1980 , 2005 .

[22]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World , 1996 .

[23]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[24]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Re-examining cognition during student-centered, Web-based learning , 2009 .

[25]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Children Designers: Interdisciplinary Constructions for Learning and Knowing Mathematics in a Computer-Rich School , 1991 .

[26]  Alexander Repenning,et al.  Making Constructionism Work in the Classroom , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[27]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[28]  A. Bruckman,et al.  The MediaMOO Project , 1995 .

[29]  Alexander Repenning,et al.  Broadening participation through scalable game design , 2008, SIGCSE '08.

[30]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  A MUVE Towards PBL Writing , 2008 .

[31]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Empowering kids to create and share programmable media , 2008, Interactions.

[32]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Students as designers and creators of educational computer games: Who else? , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[33]  Michael K. Thomas,et al.  Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns , 2005 .

[34]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games , 1998 .

[35]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  What Videogame Making Can Teach Us About Literacy and Learning: Alternative Pathways into Participatory Culture , 2007, DiGRA Conference.

[36]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[37]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[38]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 1989, IJCAI 1989.

[40]  Kurt Squire,et al.  From users to designers: Building a self-organizing game-based learning environment , 2005 .

[41]  M. Overmars,et al.  Learning object-oriented design by creating games , 2005, IEEE Potentials.

[42]  Michele D. Dickey.  Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design , 2005 .

[43]  KeFengfeng.  A case study of computer gaming for math , 2008 .

[44]  R. Sawyer.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[45]  David J. Malan,et al.  Scratch for budding computer scientists , 2007, SIGCSE.