Deploying the NASA Valkyrie Humanoid for IED Response: An Initial Approach and Evaluation Summary

As part of a feasibility study, this paper shows the NASA Valkyrie humanoid robot performing an end-to-end improvised explosive device (IED) response task. To demonstrate and evaluate robot capabilities, sub-tasks highlight different locomotion, manipulation, and perception requirements: traversing uneven terrain, passing through a narrow passageway, opening a car door, retrieving a suspected IED, and securing the IED in a total containment vessel (TCV). For each sub-task, a description of the technical approach and the hidden challenges that were overcome during development are presented. The discussion of results, which explicitly includes existing limitations, is aimed at motivating continued research and development to enable practical deployment of humanoid robots for IED response. For instance, the data shows that operator pauses contribute to 50% of the total completion time, which implies that further work is needed on user interfaces for increasing task completion efficiency.**Disclaimer: Trade names and trademarks are used in this report for identification only. Their usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

[1]  Brian Yamauchi,et al.  PackBot: a versatile platform for military robotics , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Coactive design , 2014, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[3]  Fallon Maurice,et al.  iDRM: Humanoid motion planning with realtime end-pose selection in complex environments , 2016 .

[4]  Twan Koolen,et al.  Team IHMC's Lessons Learned from the DARPA Robotics Challenge Trials , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[5]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Contact-consistent elastic strips for multi-contact locomotion planning of humanoid robots , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[6]  Kate Saenko,et al.  Grasp Pose Detection in Point Clouds , 2017, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Patrick Beeson,et al.  Cartesian Motion Planning & Task Programming with CRAFTSMAN , 2016 .

[8]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  Perception Methods for Continuous Humanoid Locomotion Over Uneven Terrain , 2016 .

[9]  Stephen Hart,et al.  The Affordance Template ROS package for robot task programming , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[10]  Julie A. Adams,et al.  Self-Rappelling Robot System for Inspection and Reconnaissance in Search and Rescue Applications , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[11]  Chien-Liang Fok,et al.  Actuator Control for the NASA‐JSC Valkyrie Humanoid Robot: A Decoupled Dynamics Approach for Torque Control of Series Elastic Robots , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[12]  Sven Behnke,et al.  NimbRo Rescue: Solving Disaster‐response Tasks with the Mobile Manipulation Robot Momaro , 2017, J. Field Robotics.

[13]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Three-Dimensional Bipedal Walking Control Based on Divergent Component of Motion , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Alexander Leonessa,et al.  Walking stabilization using step timing and location adjustment on the humanoid robot, Atlas , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[15]  Aaron D. Ames,et al.  Valkyrie: NASA's First Bipedal Humanoid Robot , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[16]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[17]  Daniel Maier,et al.  Search-Based Footstep Planning , 2013 .

[18]  Mattia Poggiani,et al.  Humanoids at Work: The WALK-MAN Robot in a Postearthquake Scenario , 2018, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[19]  Twan Koolen,et al.  Design of a Momentum-Based Control Framework and Application to the Humanoid Robot Atlas , 2016, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[20]  Larry Jackel,et al.  The DARPA Robotics Challenge Finals: Results and Perspectives , 2017, J. Field Robotics.

[21]  Peter Wells,et al.  TALON: a universal unmanned ground vehicle platform, enabling the mission to be the focus , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[22]  Matei T. Ciocarlie,et al.  Interactive Markers: 3-D User Interfaces for ROS Applications [ROS Topics] , 2011, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[23]  Johannes Englsberger,et al.  Inclusion of Angular Momentum During Planning for Capture Point Based Walking , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[24]  Twan Koolen,et al.  Capturability-based analysis and control of legged locomotion, Part 1: Theory and application to three simple gait models , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[25]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  Drift-free humanoid state estimation fusing kinematic, inertial and LIDAR sensing , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[26]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Remotely Teleoperating a Humanoid Robot to Perform Fine Motor Tasks with Virtual Reality – 18446 , 2018 .

[27]  Patrick Beeson,et al.  TRAC-IK: An open-source library for improved solving of generic inverse kinematics , 2015, 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[28]  Robert R. Burridge,et al.  Prophetic goal-space planning for human-in-the-loop mobile manipulation , 2015, 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[29]  Johannes Garimort,et al.  Humanoid navigation with dynamic footstep plans , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.