Anticipatory routing methods for an on-demand ridepooling mobility system

On-demand mobility systems in which passengers use the same vehicle simultaneously are a promising transport mode, yet difficult to control. One of the most relevant challenges relates to the spatial imbalances of the demand, which induce a mismatch between the position of the vehicles and the origins of the emerging requests. Most ridepooling models face this problem through rebalancing methods only, i.e., moving idle vehicles towards areas with high rejections rate, which is done independently from routing and vehicle-to-orders assignments, so that vehicles serving passengers (a large portion of the total fleet) remain unaffected. This paper introduces two types of techniques for anticipatory routing that affect how vehicles are assigned to users and how to route vehicles to serve such users, so that the whole operation of the system is modified to reach more efficient states for future requests. Both techniques do not require any assumption or exogenous knowledge about the future demand, as they depend only on current and recent requests. Firstly, we introduce rewards that reduce the cost of an assignment between a vehicle and a group of passengers if the vehicle gets routed towards a high-demand zone. Secondly, we include a small set of artificial requests, whose request times are in the near future and whose origins are sampled from a probability distribution that mimics observed generation rates. These artificial requests are to be assigned together with the real requests. We propose, formally discuss and experimentally evaluate several formulations for both approaches. We test these techniques in combination with a state-of-the-art trip-vehicle assignment method, using a set of real rides from Manhattan. Introducing rewards can diminish the rejection rate to about nine-tenths of its original value. On the other hand, including future requests can reduce users’ traveling times by about one-fifth, but increasing rejections. Both methods increase the vehicles-hour-traveled by about 10%. Spatial analysis reveals that vehicles are indeed moved towards the most demanded areas, such that the reduction in rejections rate is achieved mostly there.

[1]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Model Predictive Control of Ride-sharing Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[2]  Yang Liu,et al.  Proactive rebalancing and speed-up techniques for on-demand high capacity vehicle pooling , 2019, ArXiv.

[3]  P. Schonfeld,et al.  Multiple period optimization of bus transit systems , 1991 .

[4]  M. Dijst,et al.  Impact of Everyday Weather on Individual Daily Travel Behaviours in Perspective: A Literature Review , 2013 .

[5]  Rahul Telang,et al.  The Impact of Ride-hailing Services on Congestion: Evidence from Indian Cities , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  Gregory D. Erhardt,et al.  Why is traffic congestion getting worse? A decomposition of the contributors to growing congestion in San Francisco-Determining the Role of TNCs , 2020 .

[7]  Antonio Gschwender,et al.  Beyond the Mohring effect: Scale economies induced by transit lines structures design , 2020 .

[8]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Structure of Competitive Transit Networks , 2009 .

[9]  Alejandro Henao,et al.  The impact of ride-hailing on vehicle miles traveled , 2018, Transportation.

[10]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  A Markov decision process approach to vacant taxi routing with e-hailing , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[11]  Hua Cai,et al.  Dynamic ride sharing using traditional taxis and shared autonomous taxis: A case study of NYC , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[12]  Xuemin Lin,et al.  Demand-aware route planning for shared mobility services , 2020, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[13]  Huei Peng,et al.  Efficient Mobility-on-Demand System with Ride-Sharing , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[14]  Zhe Xu,et al.  Efficient Large-Scale Fleet Management via Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2018, KDD.

[15]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas , 2018 .

[16]  Yanming Shen,et al.  An Efficient Dynamic Ridesharing Algorithm , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT).

[17]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  If you are late, everyone is late: late passenger arrival and ride-pooling systems' performance , 2020, Transportmetrica A: Transport Science.

[18]  Marco Pavone,et al.  Control of Robotic Mobility-On-Demand Systems: a Queueing-Theoretical Perspective , 2014, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[19]  Weixiang Li,et al.  Interoperability Options for Shared-Use Vehicle Systems , 2004 .

[20]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Stephen D. Boyles,et al.  A general framework for modeling shared autonomous vehicles with dynamic network-loading and dynamic ride-sharing application , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[22]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore , 2014 .

[23]  Tomio Miwa,et al.  Dynamic shared autonomous taxi system considering on-time arrival reliability , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[24]  Yong Gao,et al.  Optimize taxi driving strategies based on reinforcement learning , 2018, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Rui Xue,et al.  Short-Term Bus Passenger Demand Prediction Based on Time Series Model and Interactive Multiple Model Approach , 2015 .

[26]  Emmanouil Chaniotakis,et al.  The sustainability of shared mobility: Can a platform for shared rides reduce motorized traffic in cities? , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[27]  R. Cervero,et al.  Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco , 2016 .

[28]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Operational benefits and challenges of shared-ride automated mobility-on-demand services , 2020 .

[29]  Lei Xue,et al.  User-Based Vehicle Relocation Techniques for Multiple-Station Shared-Use Vehicle Systems , 2004 .

[30]  Ricardo Fernandes,et al.  Empirical evaluation of a dynamic and distributed taxi-sharing system , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[31]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Robotic load balancing for mobility-on-demand systems , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[32]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Assessing the VMT effect of ridesourcing services in the US , 2021 .

[33]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  Vehicle Rebalancing for Mobility-on-Demand Systems with Ride-Sharing , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[34]  Lei Ying,et al.  Empty-Car Routing in Ridesharing Systems , 2016, Oper. Res..

[35]  Juliana Freire,et al.  STaRS: Simulating Taxi Ride Sharing at Scale , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[36]  Alejandro Tirachini,et al.  Ride-hailing in Santiago de Chile: Users’ characterisation and effects on travel behaviour , 2019, Transport Policy.

[37]  Marija Jankovic,et al.  Shared Autonomous Vehicle Simulation and Service Design , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[38]  Jinhuan Zhao,et al.  Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[39]  Chunjie Zhou,et al.  The Passenger Demand Prediction Model on Bus Networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[40]  Oded Cats,et al.  Exact matching of attractive shared rides (ExMAS) for system-wide strategic evaluations , 2020, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[41]  Xing Wang,et al.  Stable Matching for Dynamic Ride-Sharing Systems , 2014, Transp. Sci..

[42]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  The Role of Context in Transport Prediction , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[43]  Marco Pavone,et al.  Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems: A queueing-theoretical perspective , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[44]  Karen Aardal,et al.  Enhancing flexible transport services with demand-anticipatory insertion heuristics , 2018 .

[45]  Patrick Jaillet,et al.  Rebalancing shared mobility-on-demand systems: A reinforcement learning approach , 2017, 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[46]  Hai Jiang,et al.  Quantifying the impact of weather on ride-hailing ridership: Evidence from Haikou, China , 2021, Travel Behaviour and Society.

[47]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  On-demand ridesharing with optimized pick-up and drop-off walking locations , 2021, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[48]  Michael Lees,et al.  A Partition-Based Match Making Algorithm for Dynamic Ridesharing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[49]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  Predictive routing for autonomous mobility-on-demand systems with ride-sharing , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[50]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  Unreliability in ridesharing systems: Measuring changes in users’ times due to new requests , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[51]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Optimal assignment and incentive design in the taxi group ride problem , 2017 .

[52]  Barrett W. Thomas,et al.  The Same-Day Delivery Problem for Online Purchases , 2017, Transp. Sci..

[53]  Andrea Simonetto,et al.  Real-time city-scale ridesharing via linear assignment problems , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[54]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[55]  Dirk C. Mattfeld,et al.  Budgeting Time for Dynamic Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Customer Requests , 2017, Transp. Sci..

[56]  Louis A. Merlin Comparing Automated Shared Taxis and Conventional Bus Transit for a Small City , 2017 .

[57]  H. Mohring Optimization and Scale Economies in Urban Bus Transportation , 1972 .

[58]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  A unified framework for stochastic optimization , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[59]  Joseph Ying Jun Chow,et al.  Non-myopic Relocation of Idle Mobility-on-Demand Vehicles as a Dynamic Location-Allocation-Queueing Problem , 2017 .

[60]  Alejandro Tirachini,et al.  Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT)? A simulation approach for Santiago de Chile , 2020, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation.

[61]  Meiting Tu,et al.  How does ridesplitting reduce emissions from ridesourcing? A spatiotemporal analysis in Chengdu, China , 2021 .