99% Revenue with Constant Enhanced Competition

The enhanced competition paradigm is an attempt at bridging the gap between simple and optimal auctions. In this line of work, given an auction setting with m items and n bidders, the goal is to find the smallest n' ≥ n such that selling the items to n' bidders through a simple auction generates (almost) the same revenue as the optimal auction. Recently, Feldman, Friedler, and Rubinstein [EC, 2018] showed that an arbitrarily large constant fraction of the optimal revenue from selling m items to single bidder can be obtained via simple auctions with a constant number of bidders. However, their techniques break down even for two bidders, and can only show a bound of n' = O(n · łog m/n). Our main result is that n' = O(n) bidders suffices for all values of m and n. That is, we show that, for all m and n, an arbitrarily large constant fraction of the optimal revenue from selling m items to n bidders can be obtained via simple auctions with O(n) bidders. Moreover, when the items are regular, we can achieve the same result through auctions that are prior-independent, i.e., they do not depend on the distribution from which the bidders' valuations are sampled.

[1]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[2]  Siqi Liu,et al.  On the Competition Complexity of Dynamic Mechanism Design , 2018, SODA.

[3]  Amir Ronen,et al.  On approximating optimal auctions , 2001, EC '01.

[4]  Michal Feldman,et al.  99% Revenue via Enhanced Competition , 2018, EC.

[5]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Revenue Maximization for Selling Multiple Correlated Items , 2014, ESA.

[6]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Approximate revenue maximization with multiple items , 2012, EC '12.

[7]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  On revenue maximization for selling multiple independently distributed items , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Optimal and Efficient Parametric Auctions , 2013, SODA.

[9]  Hu Fu,et al.  The Value of Information Concealment , 2017, SODA.

[10]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  The Competition Complexity of Auctions: A Bulow-Klemperer Result for Multi-Dimensional Bidders , 2016, EC.

[11]  Noam Nisan,et al.  The menu-size complexity of auctions , 2013, EC '13.

[12]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Robust Auctions for Revenue via Enhanced Competition , 2020, Oper. Res..

[13]  Vasilis Syrgkanis,et al.  Vickrey Auctions for Irregular Distributions , 2013, WINE.

[14]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  Prior-Independent Multi-parameter Mechanism Design , 2011, WINE.

[15]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations , 2007, EC '07.

[16]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  A Simple and Approximately Optimal Mechanism for a Buyer with Complements: Abstract , 2016, EC.

[17]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Prophet Inequalities with Limited Information , 2013, SODA.

[18]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2010, BQGT.

[19]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  An n-to-1 Bidder Reduction for Multi-item Auctions and its Applications , 2014, SODA.

[20]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  The Optimal Mechanism for Selling to a Budget Constrained Buyer: The General Case , 2017, EC.

[21]  Alejandro M. Manelli,et al.  Multidimensional Mechanism Design: Revenue Maximization and the Multiple-Good Monopoly , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Simple Mechanisms for a Subadditive Buyer and Applications to Revenue Monotonicity , 2018, ACM Trans. Economics and Comput..

[23]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Optimal (and benchmark-optimal) competition complexity for additive buyers over independent items , 2018, STOC.

[24]  Yang Cai,et al.  Approximating Gains from Trade in Two-sided Markets via Simple Mechanisms , 2017, EC.

[25]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Mechanism Design for Subadditive Agents via an Ex Ante Relaxation , 2016, EC.

[26]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  A Simple and Approximately Optimal Mechanism for an Additive Buyer , 2014, 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[27]  Anna R. Karlin,et al.  A Prior-Independent Revenue-Maximizing Auction for Multiple Additive Bidders , 2016, WINE.

[28]  Christos Tzamos,et al.  Strong Duality for a Multiple-Good Monopolist , 2014, EC.

[29]  S. Hart,et al.  Maximal revenue with multiple goods: Nonmonotonicity and other observations , 2015 .

[30]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  The power of randomness in Bayesian optimal mechanism design , 2015, Games Econ. Behav..

[31]  G. Pavlov,et al.  Optimal Mechanism for Selling Two Goods , 2011 .

[32]  John Thanassoulis,et al.  Haggling over substitutes , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[33]  Christos Tzamos,et al.  The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design , 2012, SODA.

[34]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  A duality based unified approach to Bayesian mechanism design , 2016, STOC.

[35]  Yang Cai,et al.  Simple mechanisms for subadditive buyers via duality , 2016, STOC.