Human-guided grasp measures improve grasp robustness on physical robot

Humans are adept at grasping different objects robustly for different tasks. Robotic grasping has made significant progress, but still has not reached the level of robustness or versatility shown by human grasping. It would be useful to understand what parameters (called grasp measures) humans optimize as they grasp objects, how these grasp measures are varied for different tasks, and whether they can be applied to physical robots to improve their robustness and versatility. This paper demonstrates a new way to gather human-guided grasp measures from a human interacting haptically with a robotic arm and hand. The results revealed that a human-guided strategy provided grasps with higher robustness on a physical robot even under a vigorous shaking test (91%) when compared with a state-of-the-art automated grasp synthesis algorithm (77%). Furthermore, orthogonality of wrist orientation was identified as a key human-guided grasp measure, and using it along with an automated grasp synthesis algorithm improved the automated algorithm's results dramatically (77% to 93%).

[1]  Task oriented optimal grasping by multifingered robot hands , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  David G. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Quantitative Steinitz's theorems with applications to multifingered grasping , 1990, STOC '90.

[3]  B. Faverjon,et al.  On computing three-finger force-closure grasps of polygonal objects , 1991 .

[4]  David G. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Quantitative Steinitz's theorems with applications to multifingered grasping , 1990, STOC '90.

[5]  John F. Canny,et al.  Planning optimal grasps , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  John F. Canny,et al.  Easily computable optimum grasps in 2-D and 3-D , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Robert B. Fisher,et al.  Dextrous hand grasping strategies using preshapes and digit trajectories , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[8]  Karun B. Shimoga,et al.  Robot Grasp Synthesis Algorithms: A Survey , 1996, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Dinesh K. Pai,et al.  Model-based telerobotics with vision , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Experimental Robotics IV, The 4th International Symposium, Stanford, California, USA, June 30 - July 2, 1995 , 1997, ISER.

[11]  Chris Lovchik,et al.  The Robonaut hand: a dexterous robot hand for space , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[12]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Muscle and movement representations in the primary motor cortex. , 1999, Science.

[13]  Peter K. Allen,et al.  Examples of 3D grasp quality computations , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[14]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  A fast and robust grasp planner for arbitrary 3D objects , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[15]  Gary M. Bone,et al.  Multi-metric comparison of optimal 2D grasp planning algorithms , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[16]  Hong Liu,et al.  DLR-Hand II: next generation of a dextrous robot hand , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[17]  Scott H. Johnson-Frey What's So Special about Human Tool Use? , 2003, Neuron.

[18]  Kai Cheng,et al.  Advances in e-engineering and digital enterprise technology : proceedings of the fourth International Conference on e-Engineering and Digital Enterprise Technology (e-ENGDET), Leeds Metropolitan University, UK, 1-3 September 2004 , 2004 .

[19]  Michael Vande Weghe,et al.  The ACT Hand: design of the skeletal structure , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[20]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Synthesizing physically realistic human motion in low-dimensional, behavior-specific spaces , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[21]  Peter K. Allen,et al.  Graspit! A versatile simulator for robotic grasping , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[22]  Robert B. Fisher,et al.  Visual quality measures for Characterizing Planar robot grasps , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[23]  Ronald Lumia,et al.  Spatial grasp synthesis for complex objects using model-based simulation , 2005, Ind. Robot.

[24]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Towards grasping in unstructured environments: grasper compliance and configuration optimization , 2005, Adv. Robotics.

[25]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Imitation learning for locomotion and manipulation , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[26]  Matei T. Ciocarlie,et al.  On-Line Interactive Dexterous Grasping , 2008, EuroHaptics.

[27]  Lawson L. S. Wong,et al.  Learning Grasp Strategies with Partial Shape Information , 2008, AAAI.

[28]  Ashutosh Saxena,et al.  Robotic Grasping of Novel Objects using Vision , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[29]  James J. Kuffner,et al.  OpenRAVE: A Planning Architecture for Autonomous Robotics , 2008 .

[30]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Electric Field Servoing for robotic manipulation , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[31]  Matei T. Ciocarlie,et al.  The Columbia grasp database , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.