Noninteracting constrained motion planning and control for robot manipulators

In this paper we present a novel geometric approach to motion planning for constrained robot systems. This problem is notoriously hard, as classical sampling-based methods do not easily apply when motion is constrained in a zero-measure submanifold of the configuration space. Based on results on the functional controllability theory of dynamical systems, we obtain a description of the complementary spaces where rigid body motions can occur, and where interaction forces can be generated, respectively. Once this geometric setting is established, the motion planning problem can be greatly simplified. Indeed, we can relax the geometric constraint, i.e., replace the lower-dimensional constraint manifold with a full-dimensional boundary layer. This in turn allows us to plan motion using state-of-the-art methods, such as RRT∗, on points within the boundary layer, which can be efficiently sampled. On the other hand, the same geometric approach enables the design of a completely decoupled control scheme for interaction forces, so that they can be regulated to zero (or any other desired value) without interacting with the motion plan execution. A distinguishing feature of our method is that it does not use projection of sampled points on the constraint manifold, thus largely saving in computational time, and guaranteeing accurate execution of the motion plan. An explanatory example is presented, along with an experimental implementation of the method on a bimanual manipulation workstation.

[1]  Troy McMahon,et al.  Sampling based motion planning with reachable volumes: Application to manipulators and closed chain systems , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Dynamic analysis of mobility and graspability of general manipulation systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Free-configuration biased sampling for motion planning , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Frank Ortmeier,et al.  Robot trajectory optimization for the relaxed end-effector path , 2014, 2014 11th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO).

[6]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  A direct method for trajectory optimization of rigid bodies through contact , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Compliance and Force Control for Computer Controlled Manipulators , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Variable stiffness actuators: The user’s point of view , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Randomized path planning for linkages with closed kinematic chains , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The DLR hand arm system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Mike Stilman,et al.  Global Manipulation Planning in Robot Joint Space With Task Constraints , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  COMpliant huMANoid COMAN: Optimal joint stiffness tuning for modal frequency control , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Thierry Siméon,et al.  Sampling-Based Motion Planning under Kinematic Loop-Closure Constraints , 2004, WAFR.

[14]  Ahmad A. Masoud,et al.  Kinodynamic Motion Planning , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[15]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Sample-based motion planning for robot manipulators with closed kinematic chains , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[16]  Zexiang Li,et al.  A unified geometric approach to modeling and control of constrained mechanical systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Consistent task specification for manipulation systems with general kinematics , 1997 .

[18]  Ahmad A. Masoud,et al.  Kinodynamic Motion Planning: A Novel Type Of Nonlinear, Passive Damping Forces And Advantages , 2016, ArXiv.