Probabilistic analysis of manipulation tasks: a research agenda

The problem of manipulation planning in the presence of uncertainty is addressed. The worst-case planning techniques introduced in Lozano-Perez, Mason, and Taylor (1984) are reviewed. It is shown that these methods are limited by an information gap inherent to worst-case analysis techniques. As the task uncertainty increases, these methods fail to produce useful information even though a high-quality plan may exist. To fill this gap, the probabilistic backprojection, which describes the likelihood that a given action will achieve the task goal from a given initial state is presented. A constructive definition of the probabilistic backprojection and related probabilistic models of manipulation task mechanics is provided. It is shown how these models unify several past results in manipulation planning. These models capture the fundamental nature of the task behavior, but appear to be very complex. Methods for computing these models are sketched. Efficient computational methods remain unknown.<<ETX>>

[1]  M. Nuttin,et al.  Fuzzy controller synthesis in robotic assembly: procedure and experiments , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[2]  Randy C. Brost Dynamic analysis of planar manipulation tasks , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Takashi Suehiro,et al.  Methods to detect contact state by force sensing in an edge mating task , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Stavros Vougioukas,et al.  Compliance synthesis for force guided assembly , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Ken Goldberg,et al.  Stochastic plans for robotic manipulation , 1991 .

[6]  H. F. Durrant-White Consistent integration and propagation of disparate sensor observations , 1987 .

[7]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  The robustness of an admittance control law designed for force guided assembly to the disturbance of contact friction , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[9]  Michael A. Erdmann,et al.  Using Backprojections for Fine Motion Planning with Uncertainty , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Bruce Randall Donald,et al.  A Geometric Approach to Error Detection and Recovery for Robot Motion Planning with Uncertainty , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Automatic planning of fine motions: Correctness and completeness , 1984, ICRA.

[12]  L. Basañez,et al.  Assembly contact force domains in the presence of uncertainty , 1994 .

[13]  Alan D. Christiansen,et al.  Automatic acquisition of task theories for robotic manipulation , 1992 .

[14]  C. S. George Lee,et al.  Automatic generation of goal regions for assembly tasks in the presence of uncertainty , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  Programmed compliance for error corrective assembly , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  Assemblability evaluation based on tolerance propagation , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Shinichi Hirai,et al.  Kinematics and Statics of Manipulation Using the Theory of Polyhedral Convex Cones , 1993, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  Michael A. Erdmann,et al.  Using Backprojections for Fine Motion Planning with Uncertainty , 1986 .

[19]  Peter Cheeseman,et al.  On the Representation and Estimation of Spatial Uncertainty , 1986 .

[20]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Robust compliant motion for manipulators, part I: The fundamental concepts of compliant motion , 1986, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[21]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Automatic Synthesis of Fine-Motion Strategies for Robots , 1984 .

[22]  Satoshi Iwaki,et al.  Compliance design method using linear programming , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Randy C. Brost,et al.  Automatic Grasp Planning in the Presence of Uncertainty , 1988, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[24]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Planning fine motion strategies by reasoning in the contact space , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[25]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  On goal recognizability in motion planning with uncertainty , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[26]  Bruce Randall Donald Planning Multi-Step Error Detection and Recovery Strategies , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[27]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Consistent Integration and Propagation of Disparate Sensor Observations , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[28]  Michael Spreng,et al.  A probabilistic method to analyze ambiguous contact situations , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[29]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Toward a Theory of Geometric Tolerancing , 1983 .

[30]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  Planning robotic manipulation strategies for workpieces that slide , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[31]  Tomoichi Takahashi,et al.  A method for changing contact states for robotic assembly by using some local models in a multi-agent system , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[32]  S. Gottschlich,et al.  Automatic synthesis and verification of compliance mappings , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[33]  Vijay Srinivasan,et al.  Geometric Tolerancing: I. Virtual Boundary Requirements , 1989, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[34]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Fine Motions , 1977 .

[35]  Michael A. Erdmann,et al.  On probabilistic strategies for robot tasks , 1989 .

[36]  Jocelyne Pertin-Trocaz,et al.  Grasping: a state of the art , 1989 .

[37]  Jean Latombe Motion Planning with Uncertainty: The Preimage Backchaining Approach , 1988 .

[38]  J. Salisbury,et al.  Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.