Different Presentations of a Mathematical Concept Can Support Learning in Complementary Ways

Previous research has found that different presentations of the same concept can result in different patterns of transfer to isomorphic instances of that concept. Much of this work has framed these effects in terms of advantages and disadvantages of concreteness or abstractness. We note that mathematics is a richly structured field, with deeply interconnected concepts and many distinct aspects of understanding of each concept, and we discuss difficulties with the idea that differences among presentations can be ordered on a concrete-abstract dimension. To move beyond this, we explore how different presentations of a concept can affect learning of subsequent concepts and assess several distinct aspects of understanding. Using the domain of elementary group theory, we teach adult participants a group operation using a visuospatial or an arithmetic presentation. We then teach them concepts that build upon this operation. We demonstrate that our presentations differentially support learning complementary aspects of the system presented. We argue that these differences arise from the fact that each presentation supports learning by connecting to different systems of reasoning learners are already familiar with, and that it is these connections to extant knowledge systems, rather than differences in concreteness versus abstractness, that determine whether a presentation will be helpful. Furthermore, we show that presenting both presentations and encouraging participants to recognize the relationship between them improves performance without requiring additional time, at least for some participants.

[1]  John R. Anderson ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. , 1996 .

[2]  Martina A. Rau,et al.  Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning , 2017 .

[3]  S. Chinn A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Single Paper Meta-Analysis: Benefits For Study Summary, Theory-Testing, and Replicability , 2017 .

[5]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Computing Bayes Factors by Combining Simulation and Asymptotic Approximations , 1997 .

[6]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations , 2005, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[7]  K. Davidson,et al.  Does learning to count involve a semantic induction? , 2012, Cognition.

[8]  A. Reber Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[9]  Gwendolyn M. Lloyd Understanding elementary mathematics teacher education through the characteristics and activities of preservice teachers, elementary mathematics specialists, and mathematics teacher educators , 2018 .

[10]  Jennifer A. Kaminski,et al.  Concrete instantiations of mathematics: a double-edged sword , 2009 .

[11]  J. Shaughnessy,et al.  CHARACTERIZING THE VAN HIELE LEVELS OF DEVELOPMENT IN GEOMETRY , 1986 .

[12]  J. Hiebert Making Sense: Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Understanding , 1997 .

[13]  Joshua de Leeuw,et al.  jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[14]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Comparing Multiple Paths to Mastery: What is Learned? , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[16]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Multilevel (Hierarchical) Modeling: What It Can and Cannot Do , 2006, Technometrics.

[17]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Learning as Coordination , 2015 .

[18]  R. French,et al.  Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective , 2002 .

[19]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Abstract or concrete examples in learning mathematics? A replication and elaboration of Kaminski, Sloutsky, and Heckler’s study , 2011 .

[20]  U. Wilensky Abstract Meditations on the Concrete and Concrete Implications for Mathematics Education , 1991 .

[21]  Daniel M. Belenky,et al.  The Effects of Idealized and Grounded Materials on Learning, Transfer, and Interest: An Organizing Framework for Categorizing External Knowledge Representations , 2014 .

[22]  Matthew G. Jones Transfer, Abstraction, and Context , 2009, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[23]  Jeffrey Bisanz,et al.  Chapter 3 Understanding Elementary Mathematics , 1992 .

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  What Learning Systems do Intelligent Agents Need? Complementary Learning Systems Theory Updated , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Mitchell J. Nathan An embodied cognition perspective on symbols, gesture, and grounding instruction , 2008 .

[26]  Mitchell J. Nathan Rethinking Formalisms in Formal Education , 2012 .

[27]  Orit Hazzan,et al.  Reducing Abstraction Level When Learning Abstract Algebra Concepts , 1999 .

[28]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications , 1999 .

[29]  K. Fischer A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. , 1980 .

[30]  Ding Chun-sheng Processes and developments on chemical wastewater treatment , 2005 .

[31]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  L. Wasserman All of Nonparametric Statistics , 2005 .

[33]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[34]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Making sense of teaching , 2016 .

[35]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Teaching the Conceptual Structure of Mathematics , 2012 .

[36]  Gail Gong Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression , 1986 .

[37]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[38]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Discriminative vs. Generative Classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes , 2001, NIPS.

[39]  Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al.  The Advantage of Abstract Examples in Learning Math , 2008, Science.

[40]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: a Systematic Review , 2014 .