Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction.

Different forms of learning and memory depend on functionally and anatomically separable neural circuits [Squire, L. R. (1992) Psychol. Rev. 99, 195-231]. Declarative memory relies on a medial temporal lobe system, whereas habit learning relies on the striatum [Cohen, N. J. & Eichenbaum, H. (1993) Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)]. How these systems are engaged to optimize learning and behavior is not clear. Here, we present results from functional neuroimaging showing that the presence of a demanding secondary task during learning modulates the degree to which subjects solve a problem using either declarative memory or habit learning. Dual-task conditions did not reduce accuracy but reduced the amount of declarative learning about the task. Medial temporal lobe activity was correlated with task performance and declarative knowledge after learning under single-task conditions, whereas performance was correlated with striatal activity after dual-task learning conditions. These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in these memory systems in their sensitivity to concurrent distraction. The results are consistent with the notion that declarative and habit learning compete to mediate task performance, and they suggest that the presence of distraction can bias this competition. These results have implications for learning in multitask situations, suggesting that, even if distraction does not decrease the overall level of learning, it can result in the acquisition of knowledge that can be applied less flexibly in new situations.

[1]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. , 1998, Science.

[2]  M. Gluck,et al.  Impaired probabilistic category learning in hypoxic subjects with hippocampal damage , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  M. Gluck,et al.  Human midbrain sensitivity to cognitive feedback and uncertainty during classification learning. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  M. Gluck,et al.  Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[5]  E. Maguire,et al.  The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled Distinct Neural Bases of Route Following and Wayfinding in Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[7]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[8]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[9]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  M. Packard Glutamate infused posttraining into the hippocampus or caudate-putamen differentially strengthens place and response learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Poldrack,et al.  How do memory systems interact? Evidence from human classification learning , 2004, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[12]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Interaction between the Human Hippocampus and the Caudate Nucleus during Route Recognition , 2004, Neuron.

[13]  L. Squire,et al.  Medial Temporal Lobe Amnesia: Gradual Acquisition of Factual Information by Nondeclarative Memory , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Petrides,et al.  Cognitive Strategies Dependent on the Hippocampus and Caudate Nucleus in Human Navigation: Variability and Change with Practice , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  F. Craik,et al.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Gluck,et al.  Interactive memory systems in the human brain , 2001, Nature.

[18]  L. Squire,et al.  Robust habit learning in the absence of awareness and independent of the medial temporal lobe , 2005, Nature.

[19]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[20]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Inactivation of Hippocampus or Caudate Nucleus with Lidocaine Differentially Affects Expression of Place and Response Learning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[21]  G. Engel,et al.  Neuropsychology , 1994, Schizophrenia Research.

[22]  M. Gluck,et al.  Cortico-striatal contributions to feedback-based learning: converging data from neuroimaging and neuropsychology. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  O. Witte,et al.  Functional Mapping of the Human Brain , 2000 .

[24]  B. Knowlton,et al.  An implicit learning task activates medial temporal lobe in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[25]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[29]  Jane S. Paulsen,et al.  Dissociations within nondeclarative memory in Huntington's disease. , 1996 .

[30]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[31]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  A Neostriatal Habit Learning System in Humans , 1996, Science.

[32]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[33]  Brian T Crabb,et al.  Perceptual implicit memory relies on intentional, load-sensitive processing at encoding , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[34]  M. Packard,et al.  Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Hodges Memory, Amnesia and the Hippocampal System , 1995 .

[36]  L R Squire,et al.  Dissociable properties of memory systems: differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.