Fundamental Limits of Performance for Force Reflecting Teleoperation

The quality of telepresence provided by a force-reflecting teleopera tor is determined, for the most part, by the fidelity of the contact-force information fed back to the operator. These fed-back forces, how ever, also directly influence system stability, and in this paper we investigate the relationship between fidelity and stability with a view toward understanding how stability considerations impose funda mental limits on system performance. The key idea of our work is to draw an explicit distinction between the information conveyed by the force signal and the energy inherent in that signal. Using known physiological properties of the operator, we argue that there exists a natural partitioning between information and energy wherein in formation is conveyed at frequencies above roughly 30 Hz, while the energetic interaction between the slave and the environment takes place at frequencies below this. We embody this distinction in a two-channel framework that we claim provides insight into the de sign of force-reflecting systems. Using a 1-DOF model, we study the effect of various system characteristics, notably mass, stiffness, and damping properties, on performance and stability. This model is used to derive expressions for the maximum force-reflection ratio that guarantees stability against pure-stiffness environments and to investigate the role of various compensation elements, including lo cal force control around the slave. Finally, a framework is developed for force-reflecting teleoperation that maximizes the force informa tion conveyed to the operator, subject to the constraints imposed by stability considerations.

[1]  Karun B. Shimoga,et al.  A survey of perceptual feedback issues in dexterous telemanipulation. II. Finger touch feedback , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[2]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Neuromuscular Actuation System Model , 1968 .

[3]  J. Edward Colgate Power and impedance scaling in bilateral manipulation , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Force-reflection and shared compliant control in operating telemanipulators with time delay , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[6]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Stable Adaptive Teleoperation , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[7]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Performance evaluation of a six-axis generalized force-reflecting teleoperator , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  The explicit dynamic model and inertial parameters of the PUMA 560 arm , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  T B Sheridan,et al.  Teleoperator Performance with Varying Force and Visual Feedback , 1994, Human factors.

[11]  R. W. Daniel,et al.  Stability analysis of force reflecting telerobotic systems , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS '96.

[12]  '. B.Vallbo Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand-related to touch sensation , 1999 .

[13]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Asymptotic Stability for Force Reflecting Teleoperators with Time Delay , 1992 .

[14]  R. W. Daniel,et al.  Force feedback control in robots and its application to decommissioning , 1996 .

[15]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling-formulation and experiment , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  T. Yoshioka,et al.  Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Tactual form and Texture Perception , 1992 .

[18]  Ron Daniel,et al.  Specification and design of input devices for teleoperation , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[19]  Won S. Kim Developments of new force reflecting control schemes and an application to a teleoperation training simulator , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Karun B. Shimoga,et al.  A survey of perceptual feedback issues in dexterous telemanipulation. I. Finger force feedback , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[21]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[22]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Controlling impedance at the man/machine interface , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[24]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay , 1989 .

[25]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling-formulation and experiment , 1994, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..