Sample-based motion planning for robot manipulators with closed kinematic chains

Random sampling-based methods for motion planning of constrained robot manipulators have been widely studied in recent years. The main problem to deal with is the lack of an explicit parametrization of the non linear submanifold in the Configuration Space (CS) imposed by the constraints in the system. Most of the proposed planning methods use projections to generate valid configurations of the system slowing the planning process. Recently, new robot mechanism includes compliance either in the structure or in the controllers. In this kind of robot most of the times the planned trajectories are not executed exactly due to uncertainties and interactions with the environment. Indeed, controller references are generated such that the constraint is violated to indirectly generate forces during interactions. With the purpose of avoiding projections, in this paper we take advantage of the compliance of systems to relax the geometric constraints imposed by closed kinematic chains. The relaxed constraint is then used in a state-of-the-art suboptimal random sampling based technique to generate paths for constrained robot manipulators. As a consequence of relaxation, arising contact forces acting on the constraint change from configuration to configuration during the planned path. Those forces can be regulated using a proper controller that takes advantage of the geometric decoupling of the subspaces describing constrained rigid-body motions of the mechanism and the controllable forces.

[1]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Approaches for heuristically biasing RRT growth , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[2]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  A general contact model for dynamically-decoupled force/motion control , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[3]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Incremental Sampling-based Algorithms for Optimal Motion Planning , 2010, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[4]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Dynamic analysis of mobility and graspability of general manipulation systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Baris Akgün,et al.  Sampling heuristics for optimal motion planning in high dimensions , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Mike Stilman,et al.  Task constrained motion planning in robot joint space , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Mike Stilman,et al.  Global Manipulation Planning in Robot Joint Space With Task Constraints , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Grasp compliance regulation in synergistically controlled robotic hands with VSA , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  Oliver Brock,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation in motion planning , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Free-configuration biased sampling for motion planning , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Steven M. LaValle,et al.  Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees: Progress and Prospects , 2000 .

[14]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Constrained Manipulation Planning , 2011 .

[15]  Thierry Siméon,et al.  Sampling-Based Motion Planning under Kinematic Loop-Closure Constraints , 2004, WAFR.

[16]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Grasp analysis tools for synergistic underactuated robotic hands , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Consistent task specification for manipulation systems with general kinematics , 1997 .

[18]  Ahmad A. Masoud,et al.  Kinodynamic Motion Planning: A Novel Type Of Nonlinear, Passive Damping Forces And Advantages , 2016, ArXiv.

[19]  Ahmad A. Masoud,et al.  Kinodynamic Motion Planning , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[20]  S. LaValle Rapidly-exploring random trees : a new tool for path planning , 1998 .

[21]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  VSA-CubeBot: A modular variable stiffness platform for multiple degrees of freedom robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Thierry Siméon,et al.  A random loop generator for planning the motions of closed kinematic chains using PRM methods , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[23]  B. Faverjon,et al.  Probabilistic Roadmaps for Path Planning in High-Dimensional Con(cid:12)guration Spaces , 1996 .

[24]  Dan Halperin,et al.  Asymptotically near-optimal RRT for fast, high-quality, motion planning , 2013, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[25]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  Decentralized cooperation control: joint-space approaches for holonomic cooperation , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.