Linear Look-Ahead in Conjunctive Cells: An Entorhinal Mechanism for Vector-Based Navigation

The crisp organization of the “firing bumps” of entorhinal grid cells and conjunctive cells leads to the notion that the entorhinal cortex may compute linear navigation routes. Specifically, we propose a process, termed “linear look-ahead,” by which a stationary animal could compute a series of locations in the direction it is facing. We speculate that this computation could be achieved through learned patterns of connection strengths among entorhinal neurons. This paper has three sections. First, we describe the minimal grid cell properties that will be built into our network. Specifically, the network relies on “rigid modules” of neurons, where all members have identical grid scale and orientation, but differ in spatial phase. Additionally, these neurons must be densely interconnected with synapses that are modifiable early in the animal’s life. Second, we investigate whether plasticity during short bouts of locomotion could induce patterns of connections amongst grid cells or conjunctive cells. Finally, we run a simulation to test whether the learned connection patterns can exhibit linear look-ahead. Our results are straightforward. A simulated 30-min walk produces weak strengthening of synapses between grid cells that do not support linear look-ahead. Similar training in a conjunctive cell module produces a small subset of very strong connections between cells. These strong pairs have three properties: the pre- and post-synaptic cells have similar heading direction. The cell pairs have neighboring grid bumps. Finally, the spatial offset of firing bumps of the cell pair is in the direction of the common heading preference. Such a module can produce strong and accurate linear look-ahead starting in any location and extending in any direction. We speculate that this process may: (1) compute linear paths to goals; (2) update grid cell firing during navigation; and (3) stabilize the rigid modules of grid cells and conjunctive cells.

[1]  G. Einevoll,et al.  From grid cells to place cells: A mathematical model , 2006, Hippocampus.

[2]  P. E. Sharp,et al.  Simulation of spatial learning in the Morris water maze by a neural network model of the hippocampal formation and nucleus accumbens , 1995, Hippocampus.

[3]  M. Witter,et al.  What Does the Anatomical Organization of the Entorhinal Cortex Tell Us? , 2008, Neural plasticity.

[4]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Dual phase and rate coding in hippocampal place cells: Theoretical significance and relationship to entorhinal grid cells , 2005, Hippocampus.

[5]  Torkel Hafting,et al.  Conjunctive Representation of Position, Direction, and Velocity in Entorhinal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[6]  Edvard I Moser,et al.  Development of the Spatial Representation System in the Rat , 2010, Science.

[7]  Mark C. Fuhs,et al.  A Spin Glass Model of Path Integration in Rat Medial Entorhinal Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Thomas J. Wills,et al.  Development of the Hippocampal Cognitive Map in Preweanling Rats , 2010, Science.

[9]  John L Kubie,et al.  Heading‐vector navigation based on head‐direction cells and path integration , 2009, Hippocampus.

[10]  M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2008, Science.

[11]  A. Treves,et al.  Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex , 2007, Nature.

[12]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[13]  Lisa M. Giocomo,et al.  Computational Models of Grid Cells , 2011, Neuron.

[14]  Jeffrey Taube,et al.  Head direction cells , 2009, Scholarpedia.

[15]  Natalie L. M. Cappaert,et al.  The anatomy of memory: an interactive overview of the parahippocampal–hippocampal network , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  T. Hafting,et al.  Finite Scale of Spatial Representation in the Hippocampus , 2008, Science.

[17]  Lisa M. Giocomo,et al.  Phase precession and variable spatial scaling in a periodic attractor map model of medial entorhinal grid cells with realistic after‐spike dynamics , 2012, Hippocampus.

[18]  Lisa M. Giocomo,et al.  Temporal Frequency of Subthreshold Oscillations Scales with Entorhinal Grid Cell Field Spacing , 2007, Science.

[19]  N. Schmajuk Cognitive maps , 1998 .

[20]  Kamal Sen,et al.  Increasing Ca2+ transients by broadening postsynaptic action potentials enhances timing-dependent synaptic depression. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  R U Muller,et al.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[24]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Neil Burgess,et al.  A metric for the cognitive map: found at last? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map' , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Eric R Kandel,et al.  Capture of the Late Phase of Long-Term Potentiation within and across the Apical and Basilar Dendritic Compartments of CA1 Pyramidal Neurons: Synaptic Tagging Is Compartment Restricted , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Uğur M Erdem,et al.  A goal‐directed spatial navigation model using forward trajectory planning based on grid cells , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  Ila Fiete,et al.  Grid cells generate an analog error-correcting code for singularly precise neural computation , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.