Environmental deformations dynamically shift human spatial memory

Place and grid cells in the hippocampal formation are commonly thought to support a unified and coherent cognitive map of space. This mapping mechanism faces a challenge when a navigator is placed in a familiar environment that has been deformed from its original shape. Under such circumstances, many transformations could plausibly serve to map a navigator's familiar cognitive map to the deformed space. Previous empirical results indicate that the firing fields of rodent place and grid cells stretch or compress in a manner that approximately matches the environmental deformation, and human spatial memory exhibits similar distortions. These effects have been interpreted as evidence that reshaping a familiar environment elicits an analogously reshaped cognitive map. However, recent work has suggested an alternative explanation, whereby deformation‐induced distortions of the grid code are attributable to a mechanism that dynamically anchors grid fields to the most recently experienced boundary, thus causing history‐dependent shifts in grid phase. This interpretation raises the possibility that human spatial memory will exhibit similar history‐dependent dynamics. To test this prediction, we taught participants the locations of objects in a virtual environment and then probed their memory for these locations in deformed versions of this environment. Across three experiments with variable access to visual and vestibular cues, we observed the predicted pattern, whereby the remembered locations of objects were shifted from trial to trial depending on the boundary of origin of the participant's movement trajectory. These results provide evidence for a dynamic anchoring mechanism that governs both neuronal firing and spatial memory.

[1]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Differential influences of environment and self-motion on place and grid cell firing , 2019, Nature Communications.

[2]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map' , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Olga Kornienko,et al.  Visual landmarks sharpen grid cell metric and confer context specificity to neurons of the medial entorhinal cortex , 2016, eLife.

[4]  Sachin S. Deshmukh,et al.  Influence of local objects on hippocampal representations: Landmark vectors and memory , 2013, Hippocampus.

[5]  Lisa M. Giocomo,et al.  Entorhinal velocity signals reflect environmental geometry , 2019, bioRxiv.

[6]  A. S. Etienne,et al.  A brief view of known landmarks reorientates path integration in hamsters , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[7]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Grid coding, spatial representation, and navigation: Should we assume an isomorphism? , 2019, Hippocampus.

[8]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Francesco Savelli,et al.  Framing of grid cells within and beyond navigation boundaries , 2017, eLife.

[10]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  David Ball,et al.  Maintaining a Cognitive Map in Darkness: The Need to Fuse Boundary Knowledge with Path Integration , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  E. Save,et al.  Spatial Firing of Hippocampal Place Cells in Blind Rats , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias , 2017, Neuron.

[14]  Michael E. Hasselmo,et al.  Differences in Visual-Spatial Input May Underlie Different Compression Properties of Firing Fields for Grid Cell Modules in Medial Entorhinal Cortex , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  M. Botvinick,et al.  The hippocampus as a predictive map , 2016 .

[16]  Qiliang He,et al.  Environmental Barriers Disrupt Grid-like Representations in Humans during Navigation , 2019, Current Biology.

[17]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  May-Britt Moser,et al.  The entorhinal grid map is discretized , 2012, Nature.

[19]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Using Grid Cells for Navigation , 2015, Neuron.

[20]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network , 2010, Nature.

[21]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Emergent elasticity in the neural code for space , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Ron Meir,et al.  Extracting grid cell characteristics from place cell inputs using non-negative principal component analysis , 2016, eLife.

[23]  Mintao Zhao,et al.  Human spatial representation: what we cannot learn from the studies of rodent navigation. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  William H Warren,et al.  How You Get There From Here , 2015, Psychological science.

[25]  W E Skaggs,et al.  Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation , 2017, Current Biology.

[27]  Caswell Barry,et al.  Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry , 2015, Nature.

[28]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Deforming the metric of cognitive maps distorts memory , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.

[29]  I. Fried,et al.  Direct recordings of grid-like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model. , 2009, Psychological review.

[31]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[33]  John O'Keefe,et al.  Local transformations of the hippocampal cognitive map , 2018, Science.

[34]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[35]  William H Warren,et al.  Non-Euclidean navigation , 2019, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[36]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Yoram Burakyy,et al.  Accurate Path Integration in Continuous Attractor Network Models of Grid Cells , 2009 .

[38]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[39]  Noah J. Cowan,et al.  Recalibration of path integration in hippocampal place cells , 2018, bioRxiv.

[40]  Ila R Fiete,et al.  What Grid Cells Convey about Rat Location , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Environmental Boundaries as an Error Correction Mechanism for Grid Cells , 2015, Neuron.

[42]  N. Burgess,et al.  A Hybrid Oscillatory Interference/Continuous Attractor Network Model of Grid Cell Firing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  N. Burgess,et al.  Geometric determinants of human spatial memory , 2004, Cognition.

[44]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[45]  Vijay Balasubramanian,et al.  Environmental deformations dynamically shift the grid cell spatial metric , 2017, bioRxiv.

[46]  Ágoston Török,et al.  Context-dependent spatially periodic activity in the human entorhinal cortex , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Edvard I. Moser,et al.  Shearing-induced asymmetry in entorhinal grid cells , 2015, Nature.

[48]  Øyvind Arne Høydal,et al.  Object-vector coding in the medial entorhinal cortex , 2019, Nature.

[49]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Edvard I. Moser,et al.  Object-vector coding in the medial entorhinal cortex , 2018, bioRxiv.

[51]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Preserved performance in a hippocampal‐dependent spatial task despite complete place cell remapping , 2003, Hippocampus.

[52]  D. Eilam,et al.  Consistency of Spatial Representations in Rat Entorhinal Cortex Predicts Performance in a Reorientation Task , 2017, Current Biology.

[53]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Ariane S Etienne,et al.  Path integration in mammals , 2004, Hippocampus.

[55]  Lukas Kunz,et al.  Mesoscopic Neural Representations in Spatial Navigation , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons , 1996, Nature.

[57]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Human entorhinal cortex represents visual space using a boundary-anchored grid , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  Sachin S. Deshmukh,et al.  Representation of Non-Spatial and Spatial Information in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex , 2011, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[59]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Bias in Human Path Integration Is Predicted by Properties of Grid Cells , 2015, Current Biology.

[60]  J. Knierim,et al.  Influence of boundary removal on the spatial representations of the medial entorhinal cortex , 2008, Hippocampus.