Environmental stability modulates the role of path integration in human navigation

Path integration has long been thought of as an obligatory process that automatically updates one's position and orientation during navigation. This has led to the hypotheses that path integration serves as a back-up system in case landmark navigation fails, and a reference system that detects discrepant landmarks. Three experiments tested these hypotheses in humans, using a homing task with a catch-trial paradigm. Contrary to the back-up system hypothesis, when stable landmarks unexpectedly disappeared on catch trials, participants were completely disoriented, and only then began to rely on path integration in subsequent trials (Experiment 1). Contrary to the reference system hypothesis, when stable landmarks unexpectedly shifted by 115° on catch trials, participants failed to detect the shift and were completely captured by the landmarks (Experiment 2). Conversely, when chronically unstable landmarks unexpectedly remained in place on catch trials, participants failed to notice and continued to navigate by path integration (Experiment 3). In the latter two cases, they gradually sensed the instability (or stability) of landmarks on later catch trials. These results demonstrate that path integration does not automatically serve as a back-up system, and does not function as a reference system on individual sorties, although it may contribute to monitoring environmental stability over time. Rather than being automatic, the roles of path integration and landmark navigation are thus dynamically modulated by the environmental context.

[1]  Andrew P. Duchon,et al.  Do Humans Integrate Routes Into a Cognitive Map? Map- Versus Landmark-Based Navigation of Novel Shortcuts , 2005 .

[2]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map' , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  B. A. Cartwright,et al.  How honey bees use landmarks to guide their return to a food source , 1982, Nature.

[4]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of survey knowledge. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Jacobs What determines visual cue reliability? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Interactions between idiothetic cues and external landmarks in the control of place cells and head direction cells. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Knierim,et al.  Framing spatial cognition: neural representations of proximal and distal frames of reference and their roles in navigation. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[10]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[11]  Roland Maurer,et al.  Resetting the path integrator: a basic condition for route-based navigation , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  Markus Knaden,et al.  Path Integration Controls Nest-Plume Following in Desert Ants , 2012, Current Biology.

[13]  C. Barry,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Self-Location , 2014, Current Biology.

[14]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  A S Etienne,et al.  Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  Jeffrey S. Taube,et al.  Origins of landmark encoding in the brain , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  R. Wehner,et al.  Path Integration Provides a Scaffold for Landmark Learning in Desert Ants , 2010, Current Biology.

[18]  Ariane S Etienne,et al.  Path integration in mammals , 2004, Hippocampus.

[19]  R. Muller,et al.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II. Effects of environmental manipulations , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Piloting and dead reckoning dissociated by fimbria-fornix lesions in a rat food carrying task , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Metric embedding of view-graphs A vision and odometry-based approach to cognitive mapping , 2007 .

[22]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[23]  E. Maguire,et al.  The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled Distinct Neural Bases of Route Following and Wayfinding in Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[24]  Matthew Collett,et al.  Path integration in insects , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  I. Fried,et al.  Direct recordings of grid-like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  The Spatial Semantic Hierarchy , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[27]  Gordon Wyeth,et al.  Persistent Navigation and Mapping using a Biologically Inspired SLAM System , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[28]  M. May,et al.  Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Rieser Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  A. Etienne,et al.  Learning to recalibrate the role of dead reckoning and visual cues in spatial navigation , 1993 .

[32]  R. Wehner Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[33]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Visual influence on path integration in darkness indicates a multimodal representation of large-scale space , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[35]  Pete R. Jones,et al.  Development of Cue Integration in Human Navigation , 2008, Current Biology.

[36]  William H Warren,et al.  Path Integration from Optic Flow and Body Senses in a Homing Task , 2002, Perception.

[37]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Weighted cue integration in the rodent head direction system , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  William H Warren,et al.  How You Get There From Here , 2015, Psychological science.

[39]  R Wehner,et al.  Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Jennifer E Sutton,et al.  Multiple systems for spatial learning: dead reckoning and beacon homing in rats. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[42]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Reorienting When Cues Conflict , 2008, Psychological science.

[43]  Hanspeter A Mallot,et al.  Route Navigating without Place Recognition: What is Recognised in Recognition-Triggered Responses? , 2000, Perception.

[44]  M. Collett How Navigational Guidance Systems Are Combined in a Desert Ant , 2012, Current Biology.

[45]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Where did I take that snapshot? Scene-based homing by image matching , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[46]  Cyrill Stachniss,et al.  Simultaneous Localization and Mapping , 2016, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..

[47]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[48]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation , 2003, Nature.

[49]  C. Büchel,et al.  Differential Recruitment of the Hippocampus, Medial Prefrontal Cortex, and the Human Motion Complex during Path Integration in Humans , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Metric embedding of view-graphs , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[51]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[52]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  BIOLOGICALLY BASED ARTIFICIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS: REVIEW AND PROSPECTS , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[53]  Jeffrey S. Taube,et al.  Path integration: how the head direction signal maintains and corrects spatial orientation , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Visual Homing Is Possible Without Landmarks: A Path Integration Study in Virtual Reality , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[55]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Visual homing in the absence of feature-based landmark information , 2008, Cognition.